Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9124983
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T06:41:41+00:00 2026-06-17T06:41:41+00:00

I am reverse engineering a serial communication protocol. After i decode the bits I

  • 0

I am reverse engineering a serial communication protocol. After i decode the bits I am supposed to write an interface for it. My choices are split between writing a filter driver to intercept the data coming in and going out or just have a basic serial direct communication. Is there any advantage over using one method as opposed to the other?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T06:41:43+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 6:41 am

    Well, there’s a big difference:

    • Debugging your filter driver requires a kernel debugger. Options to stop a debug session in flight and edit+build your code are limited and typically requires an operating system reboot. Debugging user mode code is trivial
    • A bug in your filter driver will crash the operating system. A bug in your user mode code only crashes the program
    • Deploying your filter driver normally requires an installer. User mode code is simply linked into the program at build time.

    These are pretty grave disadvantages. About the only advantage of a filter driver that I can think of is that the code is completely invisible to the user mode programmer. This is however also a liability, there’s very little this programmer can do to help you with diagnostic information when the filter driver misbehaves.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm reverse-engineering a serial protocol and getting frustrated by bad tools. Does anyone know
Out of curiosity about reverse engineering, I am thinking of writing a simple program
Objective: Secure my Java application from reverse engineering. Idea: split the program into two
After reverse engineering code first, I got entity classes and mapping. Most of the
I'm currently reverse engineering a network protocol and I wrote a small decryption protocol.
I'm reverse engineering a server service, I sniffed the traffic between the client and
I've been playing around with reverse engineering and I am having trouble recompiling after
I know I cant prevent people from reverse-engineering my protocol but I'd like to
All what Hibernate reverse engineering generates is something like this @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY) @JoinColumn(name
Possible Duplicate: Protect .NET code from reverse engineering? we just develop a application with

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.