Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3301640
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T20:46:18+00:00 2026-05-17T20:46:18+00:00

I am reviewing C++ casts operator and I have the following doubt: for polymorphic

  • 0

I am reviewing C++ casts operator and I have the following doubt:

for polymorphic classes

  • I I should use polymorphic_cast
  • I should never use of static_cast since down-casting might carry to undefined behavior. The code compiles this case anyway.

Now suppose that I have the following situtation

class CBase{};
class CDerived : public CBase{};

int main( int argc, char** argv ){
    CBase* p = new CDerived();
    //.. do something
    CDerived*pd = static_cast<CDerived*>( p );
}

Since there is no polymorphism involved I will not use polymorphic_cast and the code will not even compile.

If at some point, someone introduces some virtual functions in the inheritance tree and I am now aware of it so I am in danger: how can I realize it?

I should move to polymorphic_cast to avoid any risk, but the code will be still compiling without any notification.

What do you do to realize about such kind of changes or prevent these case?

Thanks
AFG

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T20:46:18+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 8:46 pm

    Background you didn’t include – boost has polymorphic_cast as a wrapper around dynamic_cast<> that throws when the cast fails. static_cast<> is fine if you’re certain that the data is of the type you’re casting to… there is no problem with or without virtual members, and the code you include saying it won’t compile will compile and run just fine as is.

    I guess you’re thinking about the possibility to accidentally cast to another derived class? That’s the utility/danger of casting, isn’t it? You can add a virtual destructor then use dynamic_cast<>, as strictly speaking RTTI is only available for types with one or more virtual functions.

    Code written with static_cast<> will continue to handle the same type safely irrespective of the introduction of virtual functions… it’s just that if you start passing that code other types (i.e. not CDerived or anything publicly derived therefrom) then you will need the dynamic_cast<> or some other change to prevent incompatible operations.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

When reviewing our codebase, I found an inheritance structure that resembles the following pattern:
I am reviewing the flags we have for our MSVC projects, and I can't
I was just reviewing some old code and found the following (inside foo.asp): Const
I'm reviewing a C++ project and see effectively the following: std::vector<SomeType> objects; //then later
I have a code piece that I am reviewing (using FindBugs ). public class
While reviewing Visual C++ codebase I found a following strange thing. A run-time assert
I am reviewing code that makes the following call: id<PLResultSet> results = [sqliteDatabase executeQuery:@select
When reviewing, I sometimes encounter this kind of loop: i = begin while (
I am reviewing a big java application to see if there are any performance
I was reviewing some SQL queries and I saw a select statement that looked

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.