Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 898605
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T15:04:20+00:00 2026-05-15T15:04:20+00:00

I am running into the following issue while profiling an application under VC6. When

  • 0

I am running into the following issue while profiling an application under VC6. When I profile the application, the profiler is indicating that a simple getter method similar to the following is being called many hundreds of thousands of times:

int SomeClass::getId() const
{
   return m_iId;
};

The problem is, this method is not called anywhere in the test app. When I change the code to the following:

int SomeClass::getId() const
{
   std::cout << "Is this method REALLY being called?" << std::endl;
   return m_iId;
};

The profiler never includes getId in the list of invoked functions. Comment out the cout and I’m right back to where I started, 130+ thousand calls! Just to be sure it wasn’t some cached profiler data or corrupted function lookup table, I’m doing a clean and rebuild between each test. Still the same results!

Any ideas?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T15:04:21+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 3:04 pm

    I’d guess that what’s happening is that the compiler and/or the linker is ‘coalescing’ this very simple function to one or more other functions that are identical (the code generated for return m_iId is likely exactly the same as many other getters that happen to return a member that’s at the same offset).

    essentially, a bunch of different functions that happen to have identical machine code implementations are all resolved to the same address, confusing the profiler.

    You may be able to stop this from happening (if this is the problem) by turning off optimizations.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 438k
  • Answers 438k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If the filter statement in the inner try raises an… May 15, 2026 at 4:30 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is how I do it: Then /^"([^\"]*)" should have… May 15, 2026 at 4:30 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No, you can reuse the original object if you wish.… May 15, 2026 at 4:30 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.