Home/ Questions/Q 8032669
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-05T01:27:20+00:00

I am running into this Postgres issue where the same query takes a long

  • 0

I am running into this Postgres issue where the same query takes a long time to execute if I use a parameter vs hardcoding its value on the query string. The column name is ‘media_type’ and it’s a VARCHAR(20). I am running these queries from PHP, using Symfony2 and Doctrine2 ORM and the table in question has about 1.000.000 records.

Do I have a problem on my query? Can it be a Postgres configuration problem?

1 – Hardcoded value for media_type

duration: 5.365 ms  parse pdo_stmt_00000001: SELECT id,site_id FROM item where media_type = 'Collection' AND enabled = 'true' AND site_id = $1 AND user_id = $2 ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT $3 OFFSET $4
duration: 0.142 ms  bind pdo_stmt_00000001: SELECT id,site_id FROM item where media_type = 'Collection' AND enabled = 'true' AND site_id = $1 AND user_id = $2 ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT $3 OFFSET $4
parameters: $1 = '1', $2 = '1', $3 = '100', $4 = '0'
duration: 8.667 ms  execute pdo_stmt_00000001: SELECT id,site_id FROM item where media_type = 'Collection' AND enabled = 'true' AND site_id = $1 AND user_id = $2 ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT $3 OFFSET $4
parameters: $1 = '1', $2 = '1', $3 = '100', $4 = '0'

Execution plan:

duration: 8.640 ms  plan:
    Query Text: SELECT id,site_id FROM item where media_type = 'Collection' AND enabled = 'true' AND site_id = $1 AND user_id = $2 ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT $3 OFFSET $4
    Limit  (cost=8.38..8.38 rows=1 width=12) (actual time=8.516..8.595 rows=24 loops=1)
      Buffers: shared hit=10 read=15
        ->  Sort  (cost=8.38..8.38 rows=1 width=12) (actual time=8.505..8.530 rows=24 loops=1)
            Sort Key: id
            Sort Method: quicksort  Memory: 26kB
            Buffers: shared hit=10 read=15
            ->  Index Scan using item_media_type_index on item  (cost=0.00..8.37 rows=1 width=12) (actual time=7.955..8.397 rows=24 loops=1)
                    Index Cond: ((media_type)::text = 'Collection'::text)
                    Filter: (enabled AND (site_id = $1) AND (user_id = $2))
                    Buffers: shared hit=8 read=15

2 – Using a parameter for media_type (SLOWER)

duration: 5.557 ms  parse pdo_stmt_00000001: SELECT id,site_id FROM item where media_type = $1 AND enabled = 'true' AND site_id = $2 AND user_id = $3 ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT $4 OFFSET $5
duration: 1.322 ms  bind pdo_stmt_00000001: SELECT id,site_id FROM item where media_type = $1 AND enabled = 'true' AND site_id = $2 AND user_id = $3 ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT $4 OFFSET $5
parameters: $1 = 'Collection', $2 = '1', $3 = '1', $4 = '100', $5 = '0'
duration: 71564.998 ms  execute pdo_stmt_00000001: SELECT id,site_id FROM item where media_type = $1 AND enabled = 'true' AND site_id = $2 AND user_id = $3 ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT $4 OFFSET $5
parameters: $1 = 'Collection', $2 = '1', $3 = '1', $4 = '100', $5 = '0'

Execution plan:

duration: 71564.922 ms  plan:
    Query Text: SELECT id,site_id FROM item where media_type = $1 AND enabled = 'true' AND site_id = $2 AND user_id = $3 ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT $4 OFFSET $5
    Limit  (cost=90663.16..181326.31 rows=17184 width=12) (actual time=3.667..71564.864 rows=24 loops=1)
      Buffers: shared hit=183786 read=96585
        ->  Index Scan Backward using item_pkey on item  (cost=0.00..906610.46 rows=171836 width=12) (actual time=3.655..71564.798 rows=24 loops=1)
               Filter: (enabled AND ((media_type)::text = $1) AND (site_id = $2) AND (user_id = $3))
               Buffers: shared hit=183786 read=96585

Thanks in advance.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    This is a bit of a long-standing wart in PostgreSQL that’s historically required some interesting planner tuning to work around. It’s fixed in PostgreSQL 9.2 (in beta now) though thanks, as usual, to Tom Lane.

    E.1.3.1.3. Optimizer

    Improve the ability of the planner to choose parameterized plans (Tom
    Lane)

    A prepared statement is now parsed, analyzed, and rewritten, but not
    necessarily planned. When the prepared plan is executed with
    parameters, the planner might replan it for every constant, or it
    might execute a generic plan if its cost is close to that of a
    constant-specific plan.

    See the 9.2 beta release notes and a quick note I wrote about this on lwn.net. There’s lots of info about handling prepared / parameterised statements running slower than normal ones on the mailing lists.

    • 0