Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8629511
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T08:49:34+00:00 2026-06-12T08:49:34+00:00

I am running this program where I have multiple threads. Three threads are generating

  • 0

I am running this program where I have multiple threads. Three threads are generating signals for the same parent process. There are four handler threads for handling the signals generated by the signal generating threads. I have a monitoring thread which also receives the signals and processes according. However, I have a situation. I can see that the signals are not divided equally. I mean the signals are directed to the same process. I have four handler threads and one monitoring thread waiting for the signal. So anyone of them can receive the signal. I was expecting it to be distributed uniformly. However, I could see that at time a whole burst of signals are received by the handler threads. The very next time the whole burst of signals are handled by the monitor thread. Why isn’t it uniform. I have added a sleep call after the handler/ monitor threads complete handling one signal. So as soon as the handler/monitor completes one signal it should have given the other opportunity to handle the next signal. However, the output doesn’t show the case

#include <pthread.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <iostream>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <cstdio>
#include <stdlib.h>

#define NUM_SENDER_PROCESSES 3
#define NUM_HANDLER_PROCESSES 4
#define NUM_SIGNAL_REPORT 10
#define MAX_SIGNAL_COUNT 100000


using namespace std;

volatile int usrsig1_handler_count = 0;
int usrsig2_handler_count = 0;
int usrsig1_sender_count = 0;
int usrsig2_sender_count = 0;
int monitor_count = 0;
int usrsig1_monitor_count = 0;
int usrsig2_monitor_count = 0;
double time_1[10];
double time_2[10];
int lock_1 = 0;
int lock_2 = 0;
int lock_3 = 0;
int lock_4 = 0;
int lock_5 = 0;


double timestamp() {
  struct timeval tp;
  gettimeofday(&tp, NULL);
  return (double)tp.tv_sec + tp.tv_usec / 1000000.;
}

void sleepMs(double seconds) {
  usleep((unsigned int)(seconds*1000000));
}

void *senderfunc(void *parm) {
  srand(time(0));
  while(true) {
    int signal_id = rand()%2 + 1;
    if(signal_id == 1) {
      while(__sync_lock_test_and_set(&lock_3,1) != 0) {
      }
      usrsig1_sender_count++;
      lock_3 = 0;
      kill(getpid(), SIGUSR1);
    } else {
      while(__sync_lock_test_and_set(&lock_4,1) != 0) {
      }
      usrsig2_sender_count++;
      lock_4 = 0;
      kill(getpid(), SIGUSR2);
    }


    int r = rand()%10 + 1;
    double s = (double)r/100;
    sleepMs(s);
  }
}

void *handlerfunc(void *parm)
{
  int *index = (int *)parm;
  sigset_t set;
  sigemptyset(&set);
  //cout << (*index) << endl;
  if((*index) % 2 == 0) {
    sigaddset(&set, SIGUSR1);
  } else {
    sigaddset(&set, SIGUSR2);
  }


  int sig;

  while(true) {
    sigwait(&set, &sig);
    //cout << "Handler" << endl;
    if (sig == SIGUSR1) {
      while(__sync_lock_test_and_set(&lock_1,1) != 0) {
      }
      usrsig1_handler_count++;        
      lock_1 = 0;
    } else if(sig == SIGUSR2) {
      while(__sync_lock_test_and_set(&lock_2,1) != 0) {
      }
      usrsig2_handler_count++;
      lock_2 = 0;
    }

    sleepMs(0.0001);
  }

}

void *monitorfunc(void *parm) {

  sigset_t set;
  sigemptyset(&set);

  sigaddset(&set, SIGUSR1);
  sigaddset(&set, SIGUSR2);

  int sig;  

  while(true) {
    sigwait(&set, &sig);
    //cout << "Monitor" << endl;
    if(sig == SIGUSR1) {
      time_1[usrsig1_monitor_count] = timestamp();
      usrsig1_monitor_count++;
    } else if(sig == SIGUSR2) {
      time_2[usrsig2_monitor_count] = timestamp();
      usrsig2_monitor_count++;
    }
    monitor_count++;
    //cout << monitor_count << endl;

    if(monitor_count == NUM_SIGNAL_REPORT) {
      double difference_1 = 0;
      double difference_2 = 0;
      if(usrsig1_monitor_count > 1) {
        for(int i=0; i<usrsig1_monitor_count-1; i++) {
          difference_1 = difference_1 + time_1[i+1] - time_1[i];
        }
        cout << "Interval SIGUSR1 = " << difference_1/(usrsig1_monitor_count-1)<< endl;
      }

      if(usrsig2_monitor_count > 1) {
        for(int i=0; i<usrsig2_monitor_count-1; i++) {
          difference_2 = difference_2 + time_2[i+1] - time_2[i];
        }
        cout << "Interval SIGUSR2 = " << difference_2/(usrsig2_monitor_count-1) << endl;
      }
      cout << "Count SIGUSR1 = " << usrsig1_sender_count << endl;
      cout << "Count SIGUSR2 = " << usrsig2_sender_count << endl; 
      monitor_count = 0;
      usrsig1_monitor_count = 0;
      usrsig2_monitor_count = 0;
    }

    sleepMs(0.001);

  }
}

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
  if(argc != 2) {
    cout << "Required parameters missing. " << endl;
    cout << "Option 1 = 1 which means run for 30 seconds" << endl;
    cout << "Option 2 = 2 which means run until 100000 signals" << endl;
    exit(0);
  }

  int option = atoi(argv[1]);
  int i;

  pthread_t handlers[NUM_HANDLER_PROCESSES];
  pthread_t generators[NUM_SENDER_PROCESSES];
  pthread_t monitor;

  sigset_t set;
  sigset_t oldset;
  sigemptyset(&oldset);
  sigemptyset(&set);
  sigaddset(&set, SIGUSR1);
  sigaddset(&set, SIGUSR2);

  pthread_sigmask(SIG_BLOCK, &set, &oldset);


  int handler_mask[4] = {0,1,2,3};
  //Initializing the handler threads
  for(i=0; i<NUM_HANDLER_PROCESSES; i++) {
    pthread_create(&handlers[i], NULL, handlerfunc, (void *)&handler_mask[i]);
  }

  pthread_create(&monitor, NULL, monitorfunc, NULL);

  sleep(5);

  for(i=0; i<NUM_SENDER_PROCESSES; i++) {
    pthread_create(&generators[i], NULL, senderfunc, NULL);
  }

  if(option == 1) {
    cout << "Option 1 " << endl;
    //sleep(30);
    while(true){

    }
    exit(0);
  } else {
    while(true) {
      if((usrsig1_handler_count + usrsig2_handler_count) >= MAX_SIGNAL_COUNT) {
        cout << "Count SIGUSR1 = " << usrsig1_handler_count << endl;
        cout << "Count SIGUSR2 = " << usrsig2_handler_count << endl;
        exit(0);
      } else {
        pthread_yield();
      }
    }
  }
}

Here is my output

HandlerHandler

Handler
Handler
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Handler
Handler
Handler
Handler
Handler
Handler
Handler
Handler
Handler
Handler

You can see the burst of monitor followed by burst of handler. However, in the code once a handler/monitor handles a signal and goes for sigwait, I have added a sleep call so that the turn is passed to the next available thread. However, this is not helping. This should have made it uniform I guess. However, still monitor gets burst and print. Even though in monitor I have placed sleep after it has finished its job for a signal

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T08:49:35+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 8:49 am

    There are two different problems with your code giving you the result you see.

    The first and the most important one is that each thread is allocated a time slice for running. This time slice can be interrupted by signals or by IO but rather than that a thread will run until it finishes it’s time slice. So even if you put a sleep – if the sleep time is smaller than the time slice for that thread it will not transfer execution to other threads. If I remember on Windows this time slice is at least 5ms but generally 40ms (Although I may have the number wrong). On linux this time slice may be shorter but for general purpose linux box I think it’s the same. I used to use Sleep(0) to relinquish the time slice on Windows. usleep(0) may do the same. So the way you use sleep will not do what you want. However since you are using pthreads just call pthread_yield to relinquish CPU or sched_yield() which supposed to be better practice but who knows…

    The second problem you may be facing with the output of your test is that you actually have no direct way of controlling the order of characters output to a stream to in a multi-threaded environment. If you really want the output to be in order you need to implement a separate thread for doing the output and send messages to i using a queue and either some locking mechanism (Critical-section, mutex) or a free-lock mechanism.

    Hope this get’s you in the right direction

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a windows form that creates multiple console applications of the same program
I have a program that scales badly to multiple threads, although – theoretically –
I have multiple actions running at the same time. When Action 1 is finished
I have a tcp client - server implementation running in the same program, on
I have a situation where I might have multiple instances of a program running
Running this program is printing forked! 7 times. Can someone explain how forked! is
When I am running this program I am getting warning array subscript has type
I am getting ERROR when I am running this program at the line static
I'm running this small C# test program launched from a pre-commit batch file private
Say suppose I am running a java program through command line. And this program

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.