Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6045967
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T07:11:03+00:00 2026-05-23T07:11:03+00:00

I am searching 350 dictionary objects. Would it be more efficient to store the

  • 0

I am searching 350 dictionary objects. Would it be more efficient to store the data in Core Data or a plist for searching?

Basically, each object is a dictionary with 8 key-values. The 350 objects are stored online in a JSON feed. I would like to download the feed when the app first launches, and then store the data into either core data or plist. In the app, there is a table with several object as default. A user is then able to add/delete these items. When a user clicks add, I want to display to the user all of the 350 objects, as well as provide a search mechanism.

In that case, should I store the JSON feed into a Plist or using Core Data?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T07:11:03+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 7:11 am

    It depends. If you aren’t running into an actual performance issue, do whichever is more readable and appropriate for your application. For example, if you are saving data for which the user can add records of some sort, core data handles common situations for that and can be used with a fetched data controller to manage a table quite smoothly. It can also easily bind to your object model so you don’t have to do key lookups.

    If you have a reasonable amount of static data or editable values to a static list of keys and you always need to load all of it, go ahead and load a plist for convenience. Post more information about your specific situation and I can update my answer.

    UPDATE:

    I think you’ll probably want to use Core Data for a few reasons. First, if each of these objects have the same 8 keys, you’ll want to represent each one with a bound object instead of a dictionary. Second, Core Data is meant to be searched, sorted, and filtered. Third, with NSFetchedResultsController it isn’t much harder to bind it to a table (with right indexes) or scroller selector. If you name the properties of your NSManagedObject the same as your 8 keys, it’ll be pretty easy to load from JSON as well using KVC.

    You could use a plist, but will have to do more leg-work.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Searching one word works perfectly. I would like to have two or more words
This is on iOS. I have a Core Database with about 350 000 objects.
Searching on Stackoverflow and writing this question has taken more time than the change
Searching did not find a similar question, so: How can POST data used by
Searching turns up a simple definition: data hiding. But, consider the following two examples:
I searching for a technique to save temporary data. It should be reachable from
Searching for some sample code for converting a point in WGS84 coordinate system to
Searching for a string within a string is extremely well supported in .NET but
Searching on Google reveals x2 code snippets. The first result is to this code
Searching here I found that this question was already asked , but I think

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.