Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9002917
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 16, 20262026-06-16T00:38:16+00:00 2026-06-16T00:38:16+00:00

I am stuck at one point of the book SQL and Relational Theory, which

  • 0

I am stuck at one point of the book “SQL and Relational Theory”, which pertains to the types that relational attributes can take. The question is this:

There are exceptions to the rule that relational attributes can be of any type whatsoever, of which one is that if a relation R is of type
T, then attributes of R cannot themselves be of type T.

Why? Is it because the relation R will be of a type ‘Relation [name]’, and so attributes cannot be of this type?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-16T00:38:16+00:00Added an answer on June 16, 2026 at 12:38 am

    Consider something like this:

    create table address {
        id int,
        name varchar(20),
        details address -- the address relation has an attribute that is another of itself
    }
    

    The definition would recurse infinitely.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm stuck on one small problem that stop development for a feature I'm trying
I'm stuck on one thing i can't get solved. I have part of code,
I am stuck on this one piece of code because I can't get the
I'm doing some assignment and got stuck at one point here. I am trying
I have just started to practice c++ and I am stuck at one point.
i have stuck in one point in selenium ide the scenario is like this
I am currently stuck at one point.If i am using actionbar(NAVIGATION_MODE_TABS) with fragments.I want
I am working on a universal application where I am stuck at one point.
I am working on XSLT transformations. I am stuck at one point. Source XML:
I am stuck at one point where I want to create a list of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.