Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9183265
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T18:45:37+00:00 2026-06-17T18:45:37+00:00

I am studying thread in APUE book 2e I thought pthread_cleanup_pop functions is for

  • 0

I am studying thread in APUE book 2e

I thought pthread_cleanup_pop functions is for setting the pushed function by pthread_cleanup_push() to be executed or not. So if the argument is zero, it’s not executed and non-zero, executed.

But I looked at the code Figure 11.5 in APUE. That is…

#include "apue.h"
#include <pthread.h>

void
cleanup(void *arg)
{
    printf("cleanup: %s\n", (char *)arg);
}

void *
thr_fn1(void *arg)
{
    printf("thread 1 start\n");
    pthread_cleanup_push(cleanup, "thread 1 first handler");
    pthread_cleanup_push(cleanup, "thread 1 second handler");
    printf("thread 1 push complete\n");
    if (arg)
        return((void *)1);
    pthread_cleanup_pop(0);
    pthread_cleanup_pop(0);
    return((void *)1);
}

void *
thr_fn2(void *arg)
{
    printf("thread 2 start\n");
    pthread_cleanup_push(cleanup, "thread 2 first handler");
    pthread_cleanup_push(cleanup, "thread 2 second handler");
    printf("thread 2 push complete\n");
    if (arg)
        pthread_exit((void *)2);
    pthread_cleanup_pop(0);
    pthread_cleanup_pop(0);
    pthread_exit((void *)2);
}

int
main(void)
{
    int         err;
    pthread_t   tid1, tid2;
    void        *tret;

    err = pthread_create(&tid1, NULL, thr_fn1, (void *)1);
    if (err != 0)
        err_quit("can't create thread 1: %s\n", strerror(err));
    err = pthread_create(&tid2, NULL, thr_fn2, (void *)1);
    if (err != 0)
        err_quit("can't create thread 2: %s\n", strerror(err));
    err = pthread_join(tid1, &tret);
    if (err != 0)
        err_quit("can't join with thread 1: %s\n", strerror(err));
    printf("thread 1 exit code %d\n", (int)tret);
    err = pthread_join(tid2, &tret);
    if (err != 0)
        err_quit("can't join with thread 2: %s\n", strerror(err));
    printf("thread 2 exit code %d\n", (int)tret);
    exit(0);
}

in that program, although pop functions has zero as an argument, the pushed functions are excuted( “thread 2 first handler”, “thread 2 second handler”, are printed by cleanup function)

why pop works even though put 0 for argument?

did I get pthread_cleanup_pop wrong??

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T18:45:39+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 6:45 pm

    did I get pthread_cleanup_pop wrong?

    No, you didn’t.

    The reason your code executed cleanup handlers, is that your control never reaches pthread_cleanup_pop(0). Instead, you always execute return in thr_fn1, and pthread_exit in thr_fn2.

    Try creating the threads with pthread_create(&tid1, NULL, thr_fn1, (void *)0); instead of 1. When I do that, I get (expected):

    thread 1 start
    thread 1 push complete
    thread 2 start
    thread 2 push complete
    thread 1 exit code 1
    thread 2 exit code 2
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have recently started studying about threads. I thought of starting from the beginning
Well I am currently studying JavaFX and as a total beginner(but not in Java)
After studying Hadley's book and searching here on SO I have created a heatmap
While studying the book Introduction to Algorithms by Cormen, I found a strange thing.
I've been studying from the book Pro Android 2. I'm working through a Service
I'm studying Android process management and I'm wondering whether apps using multiple processes (not
Studying Haskell, i'm trying to code a function takeIf that given a condition and
When studying Java I learned that Strings were not safe for storing passwords ,
Studying compilers course, I am left wondering why use registers at all. It is
Studying MS Exam 70-536 .Net Foundation I've got to Chapter 11 Application Security and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.