Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 982449
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T04:41:53+00:00 2026-05-16T04:41:53+00:00

I am surprised to know that an abstract class in C# is possible with

  • 0

I am surprised to know that an abstract class in C# is possible with no abstract methods also.

abstract class AbstractDemo
{
 public void show()
  {
    Console.WriteLine("In Show Method"); 
   }
}
class MainDemo:AbstractDemo
{
 public static void Main()
 {
    Console.WriteLine("In Main Method");
 }
}

Any explaination ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T04:41:54+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 4:41 am

    Sometimes you don’t want to give the possibility to instantiate a class but you need this class as a base class for other classes.

    The reason for choosing abstract classes over interfaces is that you can provide some basic implementation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am surprised to know that getBoolean() and valueOf() method returns different results for
I am surprised to observe that mono is faster than .NET. Does anyone know
I was surprised recently to find that it's possible to have a return statement
I'm a little surprised that it is not possible to set up a binding
I was recently surprised to know that this code compiles (at least on gcc
I realize that Grails service classes are Spring managed singletons. I also know that
Does anyone know how to do this? I am really surprised at the scarce
Surprised that i havent been able to find this myself, but anyway. Let's say
I'm always surprised that even after using C# for all this time now, I
Today I was surprised to find that in C# I can do: List<int> a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.