Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7615473
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T02:39:07+00:00 2026-05-31T02:39:07+00:00

I am trying to avoid antcall in my program, so trying to move antcall

  • 0

I am trying to avoid antcall in my program, so trying to move antcall targets to target dependencies. Now I have a situation:

<target name="test" depends="a,b,c" />

<target name="a" depends="a1,a2,a3" />
<target name="b" depends="b1,b2,b3" />
<target name="c" depends="c1,c2,c3" />

Till now every thing work fine. But if i just want to skip target ‘c’ and its dependencies from execution,

<target name="c" depends="c1,c2,c3" if="skip.c" />  (considering the property "skip.c" is already set)

Now the dependencies of target ‘c’ will be executed and then it checks for condition “skip.c”.
Is there a better solution, where both target and its dependencies wont execute based on condition.

I can always go for antcall with if conditions. But looking for any another alternative.
I cant check for “skip.c” conditions in c1,c2,c3 targets as i have more conditions to check in those targets.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T02:39:08+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 2:39 am

    All dependencies of a target are processed before the “if/unless” test is looked at. There is no built-in method in Ant to avoid this.

    Instead, a good approach is to separate the dependencies from the actions. Try the following:

    <target name="test" depends="a,b,c" />
    
    <target name="a" depends="a1,a2,a3" />
    <target name="b" depends="b1,b2,b3" />
    <target name="c">
        <condition property="skip.c.and.dependents">
            <or>
                <isset property="prop1"/>
                <isset property="prop2"/>
            </or>
        </condition>
    
        <antcall target="do-c-conditionally"/>
    </target>
    
    <target name="do-c-conditionally" unless="skip.c.and.dependents">
        <antcall target="do-c"/>
    </target>
    
    <target name="do-c" depends="c1,c2,c3">
        <!-- former contents of target c -->
    </target>
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to avoid using a long else if statement. Lets say I have
I'm trying to avoid an app crash here... I have a button that will
Trying to avoid repetition here. I have an action in a base class controller
Trying to avoid re-inventing the wheel here. I have a Google Web Toolkit page
I really was trying to avoid asking this question. I have seen quite a
In short, I'm trying to avoid memory leaks. I have read http://kohlerm.blogspot.co.uk/2009/02/memory-leaks-are-easy-to-find.html and I
Trying to avoid the SomethingManager trap here... Let's say I'm going to write a
I'm trying to avoid the use of magic strings as much as I can,
I'm trying to avoid the memory leak in PHP. When I create a object
I'm trying to avoid using Interface Builder as much as possible. At the moment

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.