Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 36237
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T14:21:42+00:00 2026-05-10T14:21:42+00:00

I am trying to build a function in C/C++ to sort an array and

  • 0

I am trying to build a function in C/C++ to sort an array and replace each value with its ‘score’ or rank. It takes in a double pointer array to an array of ints, and sorts the double pointers based on the dereferenced value of the integers. I have tried quite a few times to make it work, but can’t get it down. Once again, it must sort the double pointers based on the values they point to. This is what I have:

void SortArray( int ** pArray, int ArrayLength ) {   int i, j, flag = 1;     // set flag to 1 to begin initial pass   int * temp;             // holding variable orig with no *   for(i = 1; (i <= ArrayLength) && flag; i++)   {     flag = 0;     for (j = 0; j < (ArrayLength -1); j++)     {         if (*pArray[j+1] > *pArray[j])    // ascending order simply changes to <         {              temp = &pArray[j];            // swap elements             pArray[j] = &pArray[j+1];             pArray[j+1] = &temp;             flag = 1;                     // indicates that a swap occurred.         }     }   } } 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T14:21:42+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 2:21 pm

    You’re close. You’re referencing the address of the array items when you swap, which isn’t necessary. The items in the array are pointers, and that’s what needs to be swapped.

    See below:

    void SortArray( int ** pArray, int ArrayLength ) {     int i, j, flag = 1;    // set flag to 1 to begin initial pass     int * temp;             // holding variable orig with no *     for(i = ArrayLength - 1; i > 0 && flag; i--)     {         flag = 0;         for (j = 0; j < i; j++)         {             if (*pArray[j] > *pArray[j+1])      // ascending order simply changes to <             {                  temp = pArray[j];             // swap elements                 pArray[j] = pArray[j+1];                 pArray[j+1] = temp;                 flag = 1;               // indicates that a swap occurred.             }         }     } } 

    Also, check out this lovely blog post on Bubble Sorting in case you’re interested (sorry, shameless plug :)). Hope that helps you with your homework 😉


    Edit: Note the subtle ‘optimisation’ where you count back from the array length and only increment up until ‘i’ in the inner loop. This saves you from needlessly reparsing items that have already been sorted.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 119k
  • Answers 119k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You're not synchronizing the summing properly to the blockDim.x location.… May 11, 2026 at 11:53 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer As Richard Corden points out, this issue was addressed in… May 11, 2026 at 11:53 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Not that I know of. In particular, you can define… May 11, 2026 at 11:53 pm

Related Questions

Whats the best way to go about modifying a C++ program to be used
I am new to Windows and Visual Studio. I have a strong background in
I'm trying to build a set of Lua bindings for a collection of C++
I have a C++ library and a C++ application trying to use functions and

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.