Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 829207
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T03:50:44+00:00 2026-05-15T03:50:44+00:00

I am trying to come up with a version control process for a web

  • 0

I am trying to come up with a version control process for a web app that I work on. Currently, my major stumbling blocks are two directories that are huge (both over 4GB). Only a few people need to work on things within the huge directories; most people don’t even need to see what’s in them. Our directory structure looks something like:

/
–file.aspx
–anotherFile.aspx
–/coolThings
—-coolThing.aspx
–/bigFolder
—-someHugeMovie.mov
—-someHugeSound.mp3
–/anotherBigFolder
—-…

I’m sure you get the picture.

It’s hard to justify a checkout that has to pull down 8GB of data that’s likely useless to a developer. I know, it’s only once, but even once could be really frustrating for someone (and will make it harder for me to convince everyone to use source control). (Plus, clean checkouts will be painfully slow.) These folders do have to be available in the web application.

What can I do? I’ve thought about separate repositories for the big folders. That way, you only download if you need it; but then how do I manage checking these out onto our development server? I’ve also thought about not trying to version control those folders: just update them directly on the web server… but I am not enamored of this idea. Is there some magic way to simply exclude directories from a checkout that I haven’t found? (Pretty sure there is not.)

Of course, there’s always the option to just give up, bite the bullet, and accept downloading 8 useless GB.

What say you? Have you encountered this problem before? How did you solve it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T03:50:45+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 3:50 am

    There is nothing saying that the layout in subversion needs to match what you deploy on production. You hit on the easiest and best solution — move those large files to another repository (another advantage will be that when you branch this structure, you won’t be branching the huge files as well). Then you simply need to update your deploy script to pull from two repository locations, rather than one, and put the files in the correct location on production.

    If you don’t have a deployment script yet, now is the time to write one. Even if it only contains two lines — the svn commands to pull from the two repositories — it is still better to have a script that does everything in one command than to have to type this out every time. It’s also a good idea to run tests on your content before rebooting your servers, so these tests can also live in the deployment script.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.