Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 179011
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T14:19:53+00:00 2026-05-11T14:19:53+00:00

I am trying to compile a rather large project with Borland C++ Builder 5.5.

  • 0

I am trying to compile a rather large project with Borland C++ Builder 5.5. The project compiles in the IDE, but is much too slow. However, when I compile with the command line I get an ambiguity error that was not present in the IDE:

Error E2015 Project.h 536: Ambiguity between ‘TTreeNode’ and ‘Comctrls::TTreeNode’

My command line arguments are as follows:

d:\PROGRA~1\Borland\CBUILD~1\bin..\BIN\bcc32 -Od -Vx -Ve -X- -r- -a8 -5 -b- -d -k -vi -c -tW -tWM -w-par -I[really big list of include files] -nQ:\output [really big list of files to compile]

This command is generated by make.exe.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T14:19:54+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:19 pm

    I believe the problem lies in the fact the command line compiler and the IDE compiler are different. The command line appears to be more strict about ambiguity whereas the IDE flags it only as a warning. In light of this, I guess some projects simply can’t be built with the command line tools even if they build in the IDE.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 96k
  • Answers 96k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can easily bind these new rows of values to… May 11, 2026 at 7:17 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It's not quite what you need (because it leaves a… May 11, 2026 at 7:17 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Assuming it is a global function (it shouldn't be): window[json.callback](json);… May 11, 2026 at 7:17 pm

Related Questions

I am looking at embedding perl 5.10 in a large C++ application compiled with
I am reading Josh Bloch's book Effective Java and he suggests using a builder
I'm new to Flex SDK and trying to implement a simple project using Doug
I'm trying to debug a rather complicated formula evaluator written in T-SQL UDFs (don't

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.