Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 163325
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T11:32:51+00:00 2026-05-11T11:32:51+00:00

I am trying to create a class that doesn’t re-create an object with the

  • 0

I am trying to create a class that doesn’t re-create an object with the same input parameters. When I try to instantiate a class with the same parameters that were used to create an already-existing object, I just want my new class to return a pointer to the already-created (expensively-created) object. This is what I have tried so far:

class myobject0(object): # At first, I didn't realize that even already-instantiated # objects had their __init__ called again instances = {} def __new__(cls,x):     if x not in cls.instances.keys():         cls.instances[x] = object.__new__(cls,x)     return cls.instances[x] def __init__(self,x):     print 'doing something expensive'  class myobject1(object):     # I tried to override the existing object's __init__     # but it didnt work.     instances = {}     def __new__(cls,x):         if x not in cls.instances.keys():             cls.instances[x] = object.__new__(cls,x)         else:             cls.instances[x].__init__ = lambda x: None         return cls.instances[x]     def __init__(self,x):         print 'doing something expensive'  class myobject2(object):     # does what I want but is ugly     instances = {}     def __new__(cls,x):         if x not in cls.instances.keys():             cls.instances[x] = object.__new__(cls,x)             cls.instances[x]._is_new = 1         else:             cls.instances[x]._is_new = 0         return cls.instances[x]     def __init__(self,x):         if self._is_new:             print 'doing something expensive' 

This is my first venture into overriding __new__ and I’m convinced I’m not going about it the right way. Set me straight, please.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T11:32:52+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 11:32 am

    First, use Upper Case Class Names in Python.

    Second, use a Factory design pattern to solve this problem.

    class MyObject( object ):     def __init__( self, args ):         pass # Something Expensive  class MyObjectFactory( object ):     def __init__( self ):         self.pool = {}     def makeMyObject( self, args ):         if args not in self.pool:             self.pool[args] = MyObject( args )         return self.pool[args] 

    This is much simpler than fooling around with new and having class level pools of objects.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to create a UserControl that inherits from a generic class. It does
I'm trying to create a LINQ to SQL class that represents the latest version
I'm trying to create a class that works as a flexible enum. I came
I'm trying to create a C++ class, with a templated superclass. The idea being,
I'm trying to create an instance of a class at run time. The classes
I'm trying to create a Quicksort base class using VB.NET, taking it an array
I currently have a class and I'm trying to create an easy GUI to
I am trying create a WCF service that leverages the WPF MediaPlayer on the
Trying to create a user account in a test. But getting a Object reference
Trying to create my first iPhone app that would play back audio. When I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.