Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3665124
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T01:43:25+00:00 2026-05-19T01:43:25+00:00

I am trying to define a chained map after http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2008/10/universal-design-pattern.html . I have run

  • 0

I am trying to define a “chained map” after http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2008/10/universal-design-pattern.html. I have run into a problem defining the companion object apply method. Here is what I have come up with:

import scala.collection.generic.ImmutableMapFactory
import scala.collection.immutable.HashMap

class ChainedMap[A, B](private val superMap: ChainedMap[A, B])
  extends HashMap[A, B] {
  override def get(key: A): Option[B] = {
    if (contains(key)) {
      get(key)
    } else if (superMap != null) {
      superMap.get(key)
    } else {
      None
    }
  }
}

object ChainedMap extends ImmutableMapFactory[ChainedMap] {
  override def apply[A, B](superMap: ChainedMap[A, B],
                           elems: (A, B)*): ChainedMap[A, B] = {
    // What goes here?
  }
}

Here is how I will use it:

val parentMap = ChainedMap(null, "x" -> 1, "y" -> 2)
val childMap = ChainedMap(parentMap, "a" -> 42)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T01:43:26+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 1:43 am

    Well, extending Scala collections is tricky. There’s this reference, plus some blogs and Stack Overflow questions. However, you don’t need to do it, because it is already supported.

    scala> val parentMap = Map("x" -> 1, "y" -> 2)             
    parentMap: scala.collection.immutable.Map[java.lang.String,Int] = Map((x,1), (y,2))
    
    scala> val childMap = Map("a" -> 42) withDefault parentMap
    childMap: scala.collection.immutable.Map[java.lang.String,Int] = Map((a,42))
    
    scala> childMap("x")
    res5: Int = 1
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am trying to define a border around a div tag in HTML. In
I am trying to define my own HTML attributes not for styling purposes but
I'm trying to define mappings for cpp filetype: autocmd! FileType cpp map <leader>c echo
Im trying to define a select tag in my view. My view looks like
I'm trying to define a method in my vb.net interface that will only accept
I am trying to define a dynamic var in a different namespace. The Lobos
I am trying to define a number of classes based on an abstract base
I am trying to define an abstract class that has operators to compare two
I'm trying to define a very simple function in Drools as below: import java.util.List;
I am trying to define nested modules, but I couldn't find any complete explanations

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.