Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 936877
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T21:22:59+00:00 2026-05-15T21:22:59+00:00

I am trying to design a data model which can hold a very large

  • 0

I am trying to design a data model which can hold a very large amount of data, does anyone with experience in large volumes of data have any feedback on this, ie:

// example only, not meant to compile
public class TransactionAccount {
    private long balance;
    private List<Transaction> transactions = new ArrayList<Transaction>();
    ....
    public long getBalance() { return balance; }
}
private class Transaction {
    public Date date;
    public long amount;
}

Based on what I have read, the only way to get transactional integrity on inserting a Transaction and updating balance is to make it one entity group.

However over time there would be millions of transactions for a particular TransactionAccount. The number of writes to this entity group would be low, but the reads would be much higher.

I know it could possibly be sharded, however reading the balance is a very frequent operation, and sharding it would make one of the most common operations getBalance() the slowest operation.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T21:23:00+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 9:23 pm

    The arrangement you describe should work fine. If your entity group grows excessively big (we’re talking hundreds of megabytes of transactions before this becomes an issue), you could write a procedure to ‘roll up’ old transactions: transactionally replace a set of old transaction records with a single one for the sum of those transactions, in order to maintain the invariant that the balance is equal to the sum of all transactions. If you still need to store a record of these old, ‘rolled up’ transactions, you can make a copy of them in a separate entity group before you perform the roll-up.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.