Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 914781
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T17:46:29+00:00 2026-05-15T17:46:29+00:00

I am trying to evaluate a list that represents an expression in prefix notation.

  • 0

I am trying to evaluate a list that represents an expression in prefix notation. Here is an example of such a list:

[+, [sin, 3], [- 10 5]]

What is the best way to evaluate the value of the list

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T17:46:29+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 5:46 pm

    It will be simpler if you used postfix instead of prefix. See Reverse Polish Notation (RPN). Given an expression in RPN, it is easy to evaluate that using just one stack.

    But since you asked for a way to evaluate prefix expressions without recursion and using stacks (for a possibly simpler way, see EDIT: below), here is one way:

    We can do this using two stacks.

    One stack (call it Evaluation) holds the operators (like +, sin etc) and operands (like 3,4 etc) and the other stack (call it Count) holds a tuple of the number of operands left to be seen + the number of operands an operator expects.

    Anytime you see an operator, you push the operator onto the Evaluation stack and push the corresponding tuple onto the Count stack.

    Anytime you see an operand (like 3,5 etc), you check the top tuple of the Count stack and decrement the number of operands left to be seen in that tuple.

    If the number of operands left to be seen becomes zero, you pop the tuple from the Count stack. Then from the Evaluation stack you pop off the number of operands required (you know this because of the other value of the tuple), pop off the operator and do the operation to get a new value, (or operand).

    Now push the new operand back on the Evaluation stack. This new operand push causes you to take another look at the top of the Count stack and you do the same thing we just did (decrement the operands seen, compare with zero etc).

    If the operand count does not become zero, you continue with the next token in the input.

    For example say you had to evaluate + 3 + 4 / 20 4

    The stacks will look like (left is the top of the stack)

    Count                  Evaluation                   Input
                                                       + 3 + 4 / 20 4
    
    (2,2)                   +                            3 + 4 / 20 4
    
    (2,1)                   3 +                            + 4 / 20 4
    
    (2,2) (2,1)             + 3 +                            4 / 20 4
    
    (2,1) (2,1)             4 + 3 +                            / 20 4
    
    (2,2) (2,1) (2,1)       / 4 + 3 +                            20 4
    
    (2,1) (2,1) (2,1)       20 / 4 + 3 +                            4
    
    (2,0) (2,1) (2,1)       4 8 / 4 + 3 +                   
    
    Since it has become zero, you pop off two operands, the operator / 
    and evaluate and push back 5. You pop off (2,0) from the Count stack.
    
    (2,1) (2,1)                5 4 + 3 +
    
    Pushing back you decrement the current Count stack top.
    
    (2,0) (2,1)               5 4 + 3 + 
    
    Since it has become zero, you pop off 5,4 and + and evaluate and push back 9. 
    Also pop off (2,0) from the count stack.
    
    (2,0)                          9 3 + 
    
                                   12
    

    EDIT:

    A friend suggested a way to do this without multiple stacks:

    Start from the end, go to the first operator. The tokens to the right of that will be operands. Evaluate and redo. Seems much simpler than doing it with two stacks. We can use a doubly linked list to represent the input which we change during processing. When you evaluate, you delete nodes, and then insert the result. Or you could perhaps just use one stack.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 469k
  • Answers 469k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer That's a horrible idea. You end up with code of… May 16, 2026 at 2:32 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer To implement this optimized data fetch, you have to implement… May 16, 2026 at 2:32 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I like the http_build_query function the most: $variables = $_GET;… May 16, 2026 at 2:32 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.