I am trying to get a backtrace at some point of the execution of my (c++) program.
for that I am using backtrace and backtrace_symbols. Something along this lines:
std::string stacktrace( unsigned int frames_to_skip )
{
std::string str;
void* stack_addrs[50];
int trace_size = backtrace( stack_addrs, 50 );
char** stack_strings = backtrace_symbols( stack_addrs, trace_size );
str += "[bt] backtrace:\n";
// skip frames_to_skip stack frames
for( int i = frames_to_skip; i < trace_size; ++i )
{
char tmp[4096];
sprintf( tmp, "[bt] #%d %s\n", i-frames_to_skip, stack_strings[i] );
str += tmp;
}
free( stack_strings );
return str;
}
It works but some functions names are missing. example:
[bt] #0 /path/to/executable() [0x43e1b5]
[bt] #1 /path/to/executable() [0x43e0cd]
[bt] #2 /path/to/executable() [0x43df51]
[bt] #3 /path/to/executable() [0x43dd44]
[bt] #4 /path/to/executable() [0x43db50]
[bt] #5 /path/to/executable() [0x43d847]
[bt] #6 /path/to/executable() [0x43d216]
[bt] #7 /path/to/executable() [0x43c1e1]
[bt] #8 /path/to/executable() [0x43b293]
[bt] #9 /path/to/executable(_Z29SomeRN5other8symbolE+0x2c) [0x43a6ca]
[bt] #10 /path/to/executable(_Z11SomeIN5_8symbolEPFvRS1_EEvRKT_RKT0_+0x77) [0x441716]
...
the functions 0 to 8 have one common point : they all sit in a namespace…
I tried putting function 9 in an anonymous namespace (without any other modification) and it disapears from the backtrace… which now looks like this:
[bt] #0 /path/to/executable() [0x43e1b5]
[bt] #1 /path/to/executable() [0x43e0cd]
[bt] #2 /path/to/executable() [0x43df51]
[bt] #3 /path/to/executable() [0x43dd44]
[bt] #4 /path/to/executable() [0x43db50]
[bt] #5 /path/to/executable() [0x43d847]
[bt] #6 /path/to/executable() [0x43d216]
[bt] #7 /path/to/executable() [0x43c1e1]
[bt] #8 /path/to/executable() [0x43b293]
[bt] #9 /path/to/executable() [0x43a6ca]
[bt] #10 /path/to/executable(_Z11SomeIN5_8symbolEPFvRS1_EEvRKT_RKT0_+0x77) [0x441716]
...
Is there any way to fix that?
p.s.: version of g++:
g++ (GCC) 4.6.0 20110530 (Red Hat 4.6.0-9)
edit fixed max depth of the backtrace after Code Monkey remark
edit2 added the full code of the function
edit3 the code is compiled with -O0 -g3 and linked with -rdynamic
Your problem may be the functions you are using. Your
max_depthinbacktrace(..) is set to16. That may be too low. At any rate…This blog post on C++ stack traces with GCC explains how you should be performing stack traces. In sum,
There is more information on that site (I didn’t want to copy verbatim) but looking at this code and the above site should get you on the right track.