Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 657163
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T22:47:36+00:00 2026-05-13T22:47:36+00:00

I am trying to get a JavaScript object to use the this assignments of

  • 0

I am trying to get a JavaScript object to use the “this” assignments of another objects’ constructor, as well as assume all that objects’ prototype functions. Here’s an example of what I’m attempting to accomplish:

 /* The base - contains assignments to 'this', and prototype functions
  */
 function ObjX(a,b) {
     this.$a = a;
     this.$b = b;
 }

 ObjX.prototype.getB() {
     return this.$b;
 }

 function ObjY(a,b,c) {
    // here's what I'm thinking should work:
    this = ObjX(a, b * 12); 
    /* and by 'work' I mean ObjY should have the following properties:
     * ObjY.$a == a, ObjY.$b == b * 12,
     * and ObjY.getB == ObjX.prototype.getB
     * ... unfortunately I get the error: 
     *     Uncaught ReferenceError: Invalid left-hand side in assignment
     */

    this.$c = c; // just to further distinguish ObjY from ObjX.
 }

I’d be grateful for your thoughts on how to have ObjY subsume ObjX’s assignments to ‘this’ (i.e. not have to repeat all the this.$* = * assignments in ObjY’s constructor) and have ObjY assume ObjX.prototype.

My first thought is to try the following:

function ObjY(a,b,c) {
   this.prototype = new ObjX(a,b*12);
}

Ideally I’d like to learn how to do this in a prototypal way (i.e. not have to use any of those ‘classic’ OOP substitutes like Base2).

It may be noteworthy that ObjY will be anonymous (e.g. factory['ObjX'] = function(a,b,c) { this = ObjX(a,b*12); ... }) — if I’ve the terminology right.

Thank you.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T22:47:37+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:47 pm

    You can’t really do that, because the this value by definition is immutable, you can’t change in that way what it references to.

    A workaround would be to use the call or apply methods to run your ObjX constructor function in the this object of ObjY:

    function ObjY(a,b,c) {
      ObjX.call(this, a, b * 12); 
      this.$c = c;
    }
    

    In the above example, the ObjX function is executed changing its this value, so all property extensions you make to that object in this function, will be reflected in the new object that the this value refers in the ObjY constructor.

    As soon the call method ends, the this object will be augmented and you can make more property extensions, like adding your $c value.

    Edit: About the prototypes, your sample will not work, because the prototype property has no special meaning for object in stances it will be just as any other property, it should be used on constructor functions.

    I think you might be confusing the prototype property of constructors with the internal [[Prototype]] property that all objects have.

    The [[Prototype]] property can only be set by the new operator (through the [[Construct]] internal operation), this property can’t be changed, (although some implementations, like the Mozilla one, you can access it through obj.__proto__;, and in ECMAScript 5, the Object.getPrototypeOf method has been introduced, but I wouldn’t recommend you to mess directly with it).

    Actually, when your constructor function is executed, the internal [[Prototype]] property of the object that the this value refers, has already been set to its constructor’s prototype property.

    So, as @Anurag comments, you could set the ObjY.prototype to a newly created ObjX object:

    function ObjY(a,b,c) {
      ObjX.call(this, a, b * 12); 
      this.$c = c;
    }
    
    ObjY.prototype = new ObjX();
    ObjY.prototype.constructor = ObjY;
    

    That will make that your ObjY inherit also the properties added to the ObjX.prototype, and as you see, I changed the ObjY.prototype.constructor, since the assignment in the line above will make this property to wrongly point to ObjX.

    Recommended articles:

    • Constructors considered mildly confusing
    • JavaScript Prototypal Inheritance
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 473k
  • Answers 473k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Check your Task Manager to see if you have Access… May 16, 2026 at 3:59 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Eval("foo") is a shortcut for DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "foo"). Container.DataItem contains the… May 16, 2026 at 3:59 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer So you have a list of strings, each consisting entirely… May 16, 2026 at 3:59 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.