Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9277367
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T17:05:26+00:00 2026-06-18T17:05:26+00:00

I am trying to implement a busy waiting mechanism, using 2 flags. I get

  • 0

I am trying to implement a busy waiting mechanism, using 2 flags. I get a deadlock, but just can’t understand why… it looks to me as if it should work…

sorry for the long code, That’s the shortest I succeeded to make it.

package pckg1;

public class MainClass {

public static void main(String[] args) {
    Buffer b = new Buffer();
    Producer prod = new Producer(b);
    Consumer cons = new Consumer(b);

    cons.start();
    prod.start();
}
}

class Producer extends Thread {
private Buffer buffer;

public Producer(Buffer buffer1) {
    buffer = buffer1;
}

public void run() {
    for (int i = 0; i < 60; i++) {
        while (!buffer.canUpdate)
            ;
        buffer.updateX();
        buffer.canUpdate = false;
        buffer.canUse = true;
    }
}
}

class Consumer extends Thread {
private Buffer buffer;

public Consumer(Buffer buffer1) {
    buffer = buffer1;
}

public void run() {
    for (int i = 0; i < 60; i++) {
        while (!buffer.canUse)
            ;
        buffer.consumeX();
        buffer.canUse = false;
        buffer.canUpdate = true;
    }
}
}

class Buffer {
private int x;
public boolean canUpdate;
public boolean canUse;

public Buffer() {
    x = 0;
    canUpdate = true;
}

public void updateX() {
    x++;
    System.out.println("updated to " + x);

}

public void consumeX() {
    System.out.println("used " + x);
}
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T17:05:28+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 5:05 pm

    I recommend that all the logic concerning Buffer should go into that class.

    Also, accessing (and modifying) the flags must be protected, if 2 or more have access to it. That’s why I put synchronised to the 2 methods.

    class Buffer {
    private int x;
    private boolean canUpdate;
    private boolean canUse;
    
    public Buffer() {
        x = 0;
        canUpdate = true;
    }
    
    public synchronised void updateX() {
        x++;
        System.out.println("updated to " + x);
        canUpdate = false;
        canUse = true;
    }
    
    public synchronised void consumeX() {
        System.out.println("used " + x);
        canUpdate = true;
        canUse = false;
    }
    
        public synchronised boolean canUse() {
            return canUse;
        }
        public synchronised boolean canUpdate() {
            return canUpdate;
        }
    }
    

    Also, remove the canUpdate and canUse writes from the Producer and Consumer classes, and replace the reads (in the conditons) with the methods.

    Also, it would be useful to introduce some Thread.sleep(100) in the waiting loops.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Trying to implement AVAudioplayer and get some metering data of the played music, but
Trying to implement Piwik using REST API over http but need a little help.
Trying to implement links in my foreach loop. However, can't get the $category link
Trying to implement something similar to qtip, but using a table that compares the
Iam trying to implement JMS using eclipse.But when I tried to save the code,
Trying to implement LoaderManager + CursorLoader. In onFinish method adapter should swap its cursor
Trying to implement 3-layer (not: tier, I just want to separate my project logically,
I'm trying implement a bracket in my program (using C#/.NET MVC) and I am
Just trying to implement these buttons at the moment: http://web.archive.org/web/20110721191046/http://particletree.com/features/rediscovering-the-button-element/ Can't decide which to
Im trying to implement django-socialregistration , with all dependences included, I just followed those

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.