Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4086014
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T18:39:57+00:00 2026-05-20T18:39:57+00:00

I am trying to implement a simple merge, without the use of anything pre-defined.

  • 0

I am trying to implement a simple merge, without the use of anything pre-defined. Can any one point me in right direction, would i use list comp? or recurisive etc?

any tips welcome.. so far i got

merge::  [a] ->  [a] -> [a]
mergexs [] = xs
merge [] ys = ys
merge (x:xs) (y:ys) = 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T18:39:57+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 6:39 pm

    If by “merge” you meant “splicing” the list together like below:

    merge "aaaaaaaaa" "bbbbbb"
    >>> "ababababababaaa"
    merge "lunar" "solar"
    >>> "lsuonlaarr"
    

    You could say:

    merge :: [a] -> [a] -> [a]
    merge xs [] = xs
    merge [] ys = ys
    merge (x:xs) (y:ys) = x:y:merge xs ys       
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Trying to implement simple error handling without adding buku try / except statements to
I'm trying to implement a simple tagging system (messing around in php)... I use
I am trying to implement the simple variant of quicksort defined in Wikipedia .
I'm trying to implement a simple queue that performs one task at a time.
I am trying to implement simple algorithm with use of C#'s Dictionary : My
I've been trying to implement simple low level keyhook using JNI and all went
I'm getting acquanted with Core Animation and trying to implement simple movement along a
Iam trying to implement a simple JMS(traditional not using springs) code in eclipse using
Just trying to implement a simple audit logging solution with Grails 2.0.2 and it
I'm trying to implement a simple horizontal navigation menu that just shows a single

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.