Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3792480
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T12:37:43+00:00 2026-05-19T12:37:43+00:00

I am trying to make a C++ compiled model for simple SQL commands. For

  • 0

I am trying to make a C++ compiled model for simple SQL commands. For example this could be a part of my main function which i must be able to handle :

CREATE_TABLE(books) [             // create("books");ovr[
    COLUMN(c1) TYPE(string),      // "title string",
    COLUMN(c2) TYPE(string),      // "author string",
    COLUMN(num1) TYPE(int)        // "price int"
                    ];

So in order to do that i had to overload the “[]” and “,” operators. After doing so, I figured out that the “,” overloader is executed before the “[]” one. Whereas my guess would be that “[]” should be executed first. Is there any particular reason why this happens? Or is it simply because the “[]” is executed when “]” is found?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T12:37:44+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 12:37 pm

    Your expression would be compiled to something like the following, which might explain the evaluation order:

    CREATE_TABLE(books).operator[](
        COLUMN(c1) TYPE(string).operator,(
            COLUMN(c2) TYPE(string).operator,(
                COLUMN(num1) TYPE(int) 
            )
        )
    );
    

    or

    CREATE_TABLE(books).operator[](
        operator,( COLUMN(c1) TYPE(string), 
            operator,( COLUMN(c2) TYPE(string), COLUMN(num1) TYPE(int))
        )
    );
    

    depending on how your operator,() is defined (and maybe how the COLUMN and TYPE macros are defined).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am trying to run a program compiled from C code from an unknown
I have been trying to get Qt X11 cross compiled for PowerPC for a
I am trying to automate a sequence of user inputs to a compiled application
I am trying to compile this .c code in windows using MinGW (gcc file.c
I am trying to implement a free operator function in order to stream values
I am currently involved in some interesting programming language research which has, up until
I compiled and installed GCC 4.5.1 via MacPorts in my installation of Mac OS
I'm trying wrap my head around all of the different scripting technologies for Windows
I am looking to compile my gwt application into a single, monolithic, cross-browser compatible
I really like the way padrino 'just works' with compass but I have a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.