Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 963881
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T01:44:23+00:00 2026-05-16T01:44:23+00:00

I am trying to make a sequential animation, where a loop iterates through a

  • 0

I am trying to make a sequential animation, where a loop iterates through a list of elements .post‘s and fades them in slow. The difficult part is having it so that the next iteration begins fading in before the last one has finished fading. All I have so far is a simple sequential animator that fades them in one after the other.

$(".post").hide();
var posts = $(".post"),
    i = 0;
(function() {
  $(posts[i++]).fadeIn('slow', arguments.callee);
})();

Does anyone know how I could change this to allow .post to fadeIn() before the previous elem/s have finished?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T01:44:24+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 1:44 am

    Iterate over them using each() and use a setTimeout() for each one, multiplying the duration of the animation by the current index in the each.

    var posts = $(".post").hide();
    
      // Holds reference to the index of the current iteration
      // ------------------v
    posts.each(function( index ) {
        var $th = $(this);
        setTimeout(function() {
            $th.fadeIn('slow');   // Removed arguments.callee
        }, index * 300);
    });
    

    So each setTimeout() will have a duration of n*600, which should give you the effect you want.

    By the way, if you don’t need the posts variable for any other purpose, you can eliminate it and chain the .each() after the .hide(), as in $(".post").hide().each(func...)


    EDIT: I had an error. I was using this inside the setTimeout() which has a different value. Edited to pass in the correct value.

    EDIT: Mis-read the question. Changed the duration of setTimeout() to 300 to give a partial overlap in the animations.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 466k
  • Answers 466k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The problem was that one of the tables in the… May 16, 2026 at 1:46 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Jon Skeet is likewise unhappy with .Net time calculations, and… May 16, 2026 at 1:46 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Are you calling the hello() function anywhere? If not, you… May 16, 2026 at 1:46 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.