Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 628651
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T19:39:35+00:00 2026-05-13T19:39:35+00:00

I am trying to memorize some sql syntax and I have gotten the ALTER

  • 0

I am trying to memorize some sql syntax and I have gotten the ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT syntax down. I believe I am correct when I say that when you use this syntax to add a FOREIGN KEY or PRIMARY KEY constraint, that sql server automatically creates indexes to support the constraint operations. (Is that true…or is it only true on the PK but not the FK?)

If so, when you use the ALTER TABLE DROP CONSTRAINT syntax…are the supporting indexes automatically dropped as well? Can these implicit supporting indexes be explicitly dropped? If so is the CONSTRAINT automatically removed?

I am just wanting to know how it works “under the covers”. Googling has not helped. I imagine I could have queried some sys tables to discover the truth but thought I would try here instead.

Thanks for your help.

Seth

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T19:39:36+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:39 pm

    When you add a primary key, a unique index is in fact added. Whether that addition caused the new index to be clustered depends on whether you specified that it be non-clustered or not. If in adding a primary key constraint, you do not specify that it is clustered nor non-clustered, it will be clustered if a clustered constraint or index does not already exist on the table otherwise it will be non-clustered.

    When you add a foreign key, no index is automatically created.

    When you drop a constraint, any indexes created as a result of the constraint creation will be dropped. However, if you attempt to drop a unique or primary key constraint and there are foreign key constraints that reference it, you will get an error.

    Indexes created as a result of constraint creation cannot be deleted using DROP INDEX.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Trying to find some simple SQL Server PIVOT examples. Most of the examples that
Trying to setup an SSH server on Windows Server 2003. What are some good
Trying to make a make generic select control that I can dynamically add elements
Trying to make a MySQL-based application support MS SQL, I ran into the following
Trying to perform a single boolean NOT operation, it appears that under MS SQL
I'm a Lisp beginner. I'm trying to memoize a recursive function for calculating the
Trying to get my css / C# functions to look like this: body {
Trying to keep all the presentation stuff in the xhtml on this project and
Trying to create a QtRuby application, I get the following error: /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/Qt/qtruby4.rb:2144: [BUG] Segmentation
Trying to do this sort of thing... WHERE username LIKE '%$str%' ...but using bound

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.