Question

I am trying to optimize an audio-algoritm which has to calculate two algorithms like the following in every step. Now I’ve read, that there is no algorithm for logarithms that runs in polynomial time.
My question would be, if it would make sense to do all logarithms by a lookup table, since they are always the same, although the disadvantage of a large amount of memory access?

for(int f=1;f<11000;f++){
    for(int fk=1;fk<1000;fk++){
        int k = ceil(12 * log2f((f - 0.5) / fk));
    }
} 

I’m programming in C++.

Thanks alot!

Answer 1

If what you really need is

ceil(12 * log2(/* something */))

then there is a very simple O(1) computation which will work, using a table of only 12 values.

1. Use frexp() to split the value into exponent and mantissa. (This is just bit manipulation, so it just takes a couple of cycles.)

2. Look the mantissa up in a precomputed list of the powers of the 12th roots of 2.0 (divided by 2), which you can do with at most four comparisons.

3. The result is 12*(exponent – 1) + index of the smallest root >= mantissa.

Edited to add:

There’s actually an even better solution, because the powers of the 12th root of two are reasonably evenly spread. If you divide [0.5, 1.0) (the range of the mantissa returned by frexp) into 17 evenly spaced subranges, each subrange will fall into one of two possible return values. So if you associate each subrange with an index into the vector of roots, you need only compare the target (within that range) with a single root.

It’s too late for me to write coherent English, so you’ll have to settle for code:

int Ceil12TimesLog2(double x) {
  int exp;
  double mantissa = std::frexp(x, &exp) * 2;
  int idx = indexes[int((mantissa - 1.0) * 17)];
  return 12 * (exp - 1) + (mantissa <= roots[idx] ? idx : idx + 1);
}

// Here are the reference tables.

double roots[12] = {
  0x1.0000000000000p+0,
  0x1.0f38f92d97963p+0,
  0x1.1f59ac3c7d6c0p+0,
  0x1.306fe0a31b715p+0,
  0x1.428a2f98d728bp+0,
  0x1.55b8108f0ec5ep+0,
  0x1.6a09e667f3bccp+0,
  0x1.7f910d768cfb0p+0,
  0x1.965fea53d6e3dp+0,
  0x1.ae89f995ad3adp+0,
  0x1.c823e074ec129p+0,
  0x1.e3437e7101344p+0
};
int indexes[17] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8, 9, 9, 10, 10, 11, 11 };

I tried this, and it brings the total computation time down from about 0.5 seconds (for log2f) to about 0.15 seconds, using the loop in the OP. The total size of the reference tables is 164 bytes.