Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 767317
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T18:00:37+00:00 2026-05-14T18:00:37+00:00

I am trying to test the logic from some existing classes. It is not

  • 0

I am trying to test the logic from some existing classes. It is not possible to re-factor the classes at present as they are very complex and in production.

What I want to do is create a mock object and test a method that internally calls another method that is very hard to mock.

So I want to just set a behaviour for the secondary method call.

But when I setup the behaviour for the method, the code of the method is invoked and fails.

Am I missing something or is this just not possible to test without re-factoring the class?

I have tried all the different mock types (Strick,Stub,Dynamic,Partial ect.) but they all end up calling the method when I try to set up the behaviour.

using System;
using MbUnit.Framework;
using Rhino.Mocks;

namespace MMBusinessObjects.Tests
{
    [TestFixture]
    public class PartialMockExampleFixture
    {
        [Test]
        public void Simple_Partial_Mock_Test()
        {
            const string param = "anything";

            //setup mocks
            MockRepository mocks = new MockRepository();


            var mockTestClass = mocks.StrictMock<TestClass>();

            //record beahviour *** actualy call into the real method stub ***
            Expect.Call(mockTestClass.MethodToMock(param)).Return(true);

            //never get to here
            mocks.ReplayAll();

            //this is what i want to test
            Assert.IsTrue(mockTestClass.MethodIWantToTest(param));


        }

        public class TestClass
        {
            public bool MethodToMock(string param)
            {
                //some logic that is very hard to mock
                throw new NotImplementedException();
            }

            public bool MethodIWantToTest(string param)
            {
                //this method calls the 
                if( MethodToMock(param) )
                {
                    //some logic i want to test
                }

                return true;
            }
        }
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T18:00:38+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:00 pm

    MethodToMock is not virtual and therefore can’t be mocked. What you want to do is possible with a partial mock (I’ve done it in cases similar to yours), but the method you want to mock out must be either part of an interface implementation or be marked virtual. Otherwise, you can’t mock it with Rhino.Mocks.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.