Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7175565
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T16:19:28+00:00 2026-05-28T16:19:28+00:00

I am trying to understand a bad behaviour in fragments: the onCreateView and onActivityCreated

  • 0

I am trying to understand a bad behaviour in fragments: the onCreateView and onActivityCreated methods are called even the fragment is not ‘visible’ in the layout.

If you use the code:

TestFragment testFragment = new TestFragment();
FragmentTransaction ft = getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction();
ft.add(R.id.fragmentDetail, testFragment, "test");
ft.setTransition(FragmentTransaction.TRANSIT_FRAGMENT_FADE);
ft.commit();

replacing the FrameLayout with id fragmentDetail with the fragment and then you rotate the device, the fragments method are still invoked even if the container is not present anymore in the portrait layout. This doesn’t happen if you use the ‘static’ <fragment> tag.
If you use the static fragment, the fragments methods are invoked just when the fragment appears. Is it possible to achieve the same behaviour without using the fragment tag? I need a way to avoid the rendering of the fragment if it is not in the layout.

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T16:19:29+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 4:19 pm

    I have found one fix to this. It is slightly different from the suggested Handling orientation changes with Fragments one:

        public View onCreateView(LayoutInflater inflater, ViewGroup container,
                Bundle savedInstanceState) {
         if (!fragment.isInLayout() && container == null) return null;
         ...
         }
    

    In this way you can avoid the case when the fragment is statically put into the layout (in that case the container is null but the method isInLayout() returns true.
    By the way it is still weird to me this behaviour.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've been trying to understand why the following code gives me a bad pointer
I am trying to understand why you would use jQuery.get() and jQuery.get(index) . The
I am trying to understand if it is useful to use String during programming,
I am trying understand ViewModels deeper and I have read many articles and blogs
Trying to understand what's the correct way of implementing OpenID authentication with Spring Security.
Trying to understand the Deezer API. When I visit: http://connect.deezer.com/oauth/auth.php?app_id=MY_APP_ID&redirect_uri=http://mydomain.me&perms=basic_access I end up at
Trying to understand PNG format. Consider this PNG Image: The Image is taken from
Trying to understand the options for will_paginate's paginate method: :page — REQUIRED, but defaults
Trying to understand Ruby a bit better, I ran into this code surfing the
Trying to understand something. I created a d:\svn\repository on my server. I committed folders

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.