Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 776089
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T19:23:43+00:00 2026-05-14T19:23:43+00:00

I am trying to use futures for the first time. It seems smart that

  • 0

I am trying to use futures for the first time. It seems smart that you can cancel a job, but it is not working as expected. In the example below, only the first job is cancelled. The rest are completed. Have I misunderstood the use of futures?

public class ThreadExample 
{
    public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException 
    {
        int processors = Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors();
        System.out.println("Processors: " + processors);
        ExecutorService es = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(processors);
        int nowork = 10;
        Future<Integer>[] workres = new Future[nowork];
        for(int i = 0; i < nowork; i++)
        {
            workres[i] = es.submit(new SomeWork(i));
        }
        for(int i = 0; i < nowork; i++) 
        {
            if(i % 2 == 0)
            {
                System.out.println("Cancel");
                workres[i].cancel(true);
            }
            if(workres[i].isCancelled())
            {
                System.out.println(workres[i] + " is cancelled");
            }
            else
            {
                System.out.println(workres[i].get());
            }
        }
        es.shutdown();
    }
}

class SomeWork implements Callable<Integer> 
{
    private int v;
    public SomeWork(int v) 
    {
        this.v = v;
    }

    @Override
    public Integer call() throws Exception
    {
        TimeUnit.SECONDS.sleep(5);
        System.out.println(v + " done at " + (new Date()));
        return v;
    }
}

The output:

Processors: 4
Cancel
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask@10d448 is cancelled
4 done at Wed May 12 17:47:05 CEST 2010
2 done at Wed May 12 17:47:05 CEST 2010
1 done at Wed May 12 17:47:05 CEST 2010
3 done at Wed May 12 17:47:05 CEST 2010
1
Cancel
2  
3
Cancel
4
5 done at Wed May 12 17:47:10 CEST 2010
7 done at Wed May 12 17:47:10 CEST 2010
8 done at Wed May 12 17:47:10 CEST 2010
6 done at Wed May 12 17:47:10 CEST 2010  
5
Cancel
6
7
Cancel
8
9 done at Wed May 12 17:47:15 CEST 2010  
9
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T19:23:44+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 7:23 pm

    The problem is that your cancellation loop is overlapping with your get() loop, which blocks. I think you want to have 2 loops, don’t you? One loop that cancels even numbered jobs, and then a second loop that checks which ones are cancelled and which ones aren’t, and then get() accordingly.

    The way it’s written right now, before the loop even had a chance to cancel workres[2], it checked and asked for get() from workres[1].

    So I think you need 3 phases:

    1. The `submit()` loop
    2. The selective `cancel()` loop
    3. The selective `get()` loop (which blocks)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to use WebSockets for the first time, and I'm making a todo
I've got some soapUI tests, that use groovy scripts to first insert some data
I'm working my way through 'head first design patterns' and want to use this
I am trying to use JavaScript to validate forms but if the form doesn't
I'm using Python 2.5. I'm trying to use this 'with' statement. from __future__ import
i'm trying use facebook API to upload photo in my fan page. I downloaded
I am trying use gem tire to search in my application. I have tables
I was trying use a set of filter functions to run the appropriate routine,
I'm trying use self-signed certificate (c#): X509Certificate2 cert = new X509Certificate2( Server.MapPath(~/App_Data/myhost.pfx), pass); on
I'm trying use mod_rewrite to rewrite URLs from the following: http://www.site.com/one-two-file.php to http://www.site.com/one/two/file.php The

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.