Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 630527
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T19:51:52+00:00 2026-05-13T19:51:52+00:00

I am trying to write XML Schema by existing XML format description (i.e. document

  • 0

I am trying to write XML Schema by existing XML format description (i.e. document – free form description of elements multiplicity and types). My final idea is to feed such XSD to code generator and get binding classes.

Here is an example I cannot cope with:

packet1.xml:

<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<packet kind="type1">
    <field1>value1</field1>
    <field2>value2</field2>
</packet>

packet2.xml:

<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<packet kind="type2">
    <field1>value3</field1>
    <field3>value4</field3>
</packet>

So, instead of element name, type is defined in attribute value. type1 and type2 uniquely define type of packet, i.e. type defines set and types of nested fields.

My idea is to use polymorphic types in XML and XML Schema sketch is like the following:

schema.xsd:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xsd:schema>
    <xsd:complexType name="protocol_abstract" abstract="true"/>
    <xsd:element name="protocol" type="protocol_abstract"/>

    <xsd:complexType name="protocol_type1"/>
        <xsd:complexContent>
            <xsd:extension base="protocol_abstract"/>
                <xsd:sequence>
                    <xsd:element name="field1" type="xsd:string"/>
                    <xsd:element name="field2" type="xsd:string"/>
                </xsd:sequence>
                <xsd:attribute name="kind" type="xsd:NMTOKEN" fixed="type1"/>
            </xsd:extension>
        </xsd:complexContent>
    </xsd:complexType>

    <xsd:complexType name="protocol_type2"/>
        <xsd:complexContent>
            <xsd:extension base="protocol_abstract"/>
                <xsd:sequence>
                    <xsd:element name="field1" type="xsd:string"/>
                    <xsd:element name="field3" type="xsd:string"/>
                </xsd:sequence>
                <xsd:attribute name="kind" type="xsd:NMTOKEN" fixed="type2"/>
            </xsd:extension>
        </xsd:complexContent>
    </xsd:complexType>
</xsd:schema>

This almost does the trick, but requires xsi:type specification:

packet21.xml:

<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<packet kind="type1" xsi:kind="packet_type1">
    <field1>value1</field1>
    <field2>value2</field2>
</packet>

packet22.xml:

<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<packet kind="type2" xsi:kind="packet_type2">
    <field1>value3</field1>
    <field3>value4</field3>
</packet>

With such definition, validator confirms XML is correct. But, it’s not very convenient, incoming messages don’t contain xsi:type.

Is it possible to get rid of xsi:type and use only my kind attribute?
Are there any other way doing this besides preprocessing? (convert attribute value to element name)

Thanks for any ideas in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T19:51:53+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:51 pm

    No. xsi:type is the only way to do this. Other than that, XML schema does not support conditional validation.

    If you need further validation of such constraints, you need to code them or use something like Schematron.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 365k
  • Answers 365k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can use the data in the /proc filesystem to… May 14, 2026 at 3:57 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Do you still get the error when you use a… May 14, 2026 at 3:57 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can use array_chunk to create a single array comprised… May 14, 2026 at 3:57 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.