Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 65297
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T18:55:28+00:00 2026-05-10T18:55:28+00:00

I am using a fictional example for this. Say, I have a Widget class

  • 0

I am using a fictional example for this. Say, I have a Widget class like:

abstract class Widget { Widget parent; } 

Now, my other classes would be derived from this Widget class, but suppose I want to put some constraint in the class while defining the derived types such that only a particular ‘type’ of widget can be parent to a particular type of Widget.

For example, I have derived two more widgets from the Widget class, WidgetParent and WidgetChild. While defining the child class, I want to define the type of parent as WidgetParent, so that I dont have to type cast the parent every time I use it.

Precisely, what I would have liked to do is this:

// This does not works! class Widget<PType>: where PType: Widget {     PType parent; }  class WidgetParent<Widget> {     public void Slap(); }  class WidgetChild<WidgetParent> { } 

So that when I want to access the parent of WidgetChild, instead of using it this way:

WidgetParent wp = wc.parent as WidgetParent; if(wp != null) {     wp.Slap(); } else throw FakeParentException(); 

I want to use it this way(if I could use generics):

wc.parent.Slap(); 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T18:55:28+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 6:55 pm

    You should be able to use the code you’ve got by still having the non-generic class Widget and making Widget<T> derive from it:

    public abstract class Widget { }  public abstract class Widget<T> : Widget where T : Widget { } 

    You then need to work out what belongs in the generic class and what belongs in the non-generic… from experience, this can be a tricky balancing act. Expect to go back and forth a fair amount!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Related Questions

Loading...

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 54k
  • Answers 54k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer Model defined functions are not in the shipping Entity Framework,… May 11, 2026 at 7:28 am
  • added an answer You will be needing that traditional exception handling no matter… May 11, 2026 at 7:28 am
  • added an answer You have just written an annotation. Regarding the default statement… May 11, 2026 at 7:28 am

Top Members

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.