Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8853893
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T13:45:29+00:00 2026-06-14T13:45:29+00:00

I am using defaultdict(set) to populate an internal mapping in a very large data

  • 0

I am using defaultdict(set) to populate an internal mapping in a very large data structure. After it’s populated, the whole structure (including the mapping) is exposed to the client code. At that point, I don’t want anyone modifying the mapping.

And nobody does, intentionally. But sometimes, client code may by accident refer to an element that doesn’t exist. At that point, a normal dictionary would have raised KeyError, but since the mapping is defaultdict, it simply creates a new element (an empty set) at that key. This is quite hard to catch, since everything happens silently. But I need to ensure this doesn’t happen (the semantics actually doesn’t break, but the mapping grows to a huge size).

What should I do? I can see these choices:

  1. Find all the instances in current and future client code where a dictionary lookup is performed on the mapping, and convert it to mapping.get(k, {}) instead. This is just terrible.

  2. “Freeze” defaultdict after the data structure is fully initialized, by converting it to dict. (I know it’s not really frozen, but I trust client code to not actually write mapping[k] = v.) Inelegant, and a large performance hit.

  3. Wrap defaultdict into a dict interface. What’s an elegant way to do that? I’m afraid the performance hit may be huge though (this lookup is heavily used in tight loops).

  4. Subclass defaultdict and add a method that “shuts down” all the defaultdict features, leaving it to behave as if it’s a regular dict. It’s a variant of 3 above, but I’m not sure if it’s any faster. And I don’t know if it’s doable without relying on the implementation details.

  5. Use regular dict in the data structure, rewriting all the code there to first check if the element is in the dictionary and adding it if it’s not. Not good.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T13:45:30+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 1:45 pm

    defaultdict docs say for default_factory:

    If the default_factory attribute is None, this raises a KeyError
    exception with the key as argument.

    What if you just set your defaultdict’s default_factory to None? E.g.,

    >>> d = defaultdict(int)
    >>> d['a'] += 1
    >>> d
    defaultdict(<type 'int'>, {'a': 1})
    >>> d.default_factory = None
    >>> d['b'] += 2
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
    KeyError: 'b'
    >>> 
    

    Not sure if this is the best approach, but seems to work.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a very large defaultdict(dict) that looks something like this: data['w']['x']['y']['z']={'a':5,'b':10} I'm trying
Using a populated Table Type as the source for a TSQL-Merge. I want to
I was using python to create a dictionary but as my data got larger
When using min() on a defaultdict object, it strangely returns the maximum if used
To optimize some code, I am using the following: a = defaultdict(lambda: len(a)) a[0]
Using PyGtk's IconView, I can set the icons to be reorderable by calling gtk.IconView.set_reorderable(True)
I am using this code to generate random text : from collections import defaultdict,
I am iterating a dict created using the following. tree = defaultdict(partial(defaultdict, partial(defaultdict, list)))
Below is the list of dict using trying to generate dict data = [
I created a dictionary of lists using: names = defaultdict(list) I am reading a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.