Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9138931
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T09:19:16+00:00 2026-06-17T09:19:16+00:00

I am using hazelcast (v2.1.3) – in the storeload for the map, store keeps

  • 0

I am using hazelcast (v2.1.3) – in the storeload for the map, “store” keeps getting invoked instead of “store all” (even though the write delay seconds flag is greater than 0):

<map-store enabled="true">
<class-name>test.test.abcMap</class-name>
<write-delay-seconds>5</write-delay-seconds> 
</map-store>

Any useful suggestions to help troubleshoot this would be quite welcome. I had asynch write behinds working on a different project but cannot seem to get them working right now. Thanks

Edit
After the delay specified in the write-delay-seconds, the store implementation gets invoked (as opposed to the store all).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T09:19:16+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 9:19 am

    Are you sure you have more than one entry that needs to be stored?

    If only one entry in the map has been added or updated, MapStore.store(key, value) will be called even if you have write-behind enabled. MapStore.storeAll(map) will only be called if more than one entry needs to be stored.

    Here’s the relevant code from com.hazelcast.impl.CMap.runStoreUpdate() (the member store is of type MapStore):

    if (updates.size() == 1) {
        Map.Entry entry = updates.entrySet().iterator().next();
        store.store(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
    } else if (updates.size() > 1) {
        store.storeAll(updates);
    }
    

    The same applies to MapStore.delete() and MapStore.deleteAll().

    You can see this code in context in the Hazelcast source at Github

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm using hazelcast IMap[String,Any] in my application. When printing the map it should be
I am using spring with hazelcast and the PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer of spring for inserting properties
Using the Redis info command, I am able to get all the stats of
Using getDefinitionByName I am consistently getting the error saying it is not defined (as
Using php's DOMDocument->LoadHTMLFile('test.html'); keeps on returning an error to me, reporting for an error
I've been using Hazelcast recently and because I quite like it, I'm at the
I'm using Spring @Cacheable annotation with Hazelcast 2.1 and Spring 3.1. @Cacheable(testCache) public MyObject
Using JNotify in project and it fulfill my all requirements, but some times it
Im working on a project in which I'm using Hazelcast (version : 1.9.3.1) as
From the wiki HazelCast works like: After discovery, node communication is only TCP/IP using

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.