Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I am using javaHg on our company’s web-application.
I want to avoid installing mercurial when I setup the new release on our server. Do I need to go into details as to why management doesn’t want “external” applications installed on the server?
I have a windows portable mercurial in a sub-directory. Is it possible to “point” javaHg to that hg.exe, rather than setting the directory path as an environmental viariable? There must be no tweaking and setups when employing the new release.
Yes, you don’t need to set
PATHfor this. There is a RepositoryConfiguration class that you should use, see thesetHgBinmethod. You pass the configuration object to theRepositoryobject when you create it and it will then use the configured Mercurial binary to start the command server.