Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6753803
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T13:12:19+00:00 2026-05-26T13:12:19+00:00

I am using Linux with x86 (64 bit to be precise). Is there a

  • 0

I am using Linux with x86 (64 bit to be precise). Is there a way I can get the address of the current instruction. Actually I want to write my own simplified versions of setjmp/longjmp. Here, R.. posted a simplified version of longjmp. Any idea how setjmp is implemented. A simplified version that is, without taking into account of exceptions and signals etc…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T13:12:19+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 1:12 pm

    I believe in 64-bit code you can simply do lea rax, [rip].

    The 32-bit idiom is:

          call next
    next: pop eax
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there significant cpu/memory overhead associated with using automatic arrays with g++/Intel on 64-bit
I have an application that was developed for Linux x86 32 bits. There are
I am using the Linux version of dbxtool to debug a 64-bit programme called
I tried to remote debug an 32-bit application on x86_64 suse linux, but get
I have built GCC 4.7 on my x86 32-bit linux system. When I try
I am emulating qemu for linux x86-64. In qemu virtual machine, I am using
I'm using GNU bash, version 3.00.15(1)-release (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu). And this command: echo -e doesn't print
im using linux with gedit which has the wonderful habit of creating a temp
I recently started using Linux as my primary OS. What are the tools that
I'm using Linux Inotify to detect FS events on my program. How could I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.