Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3427888
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T06:53:33+00:00 2026-05-18T06:53:33+00:00

I am using my own iterable structures – various BinaryTrees. Can I simply marshal

  • 0

I am using my own iterable structures – various BinaryTrees. Can I simply marshal them? It’s quite easy to marshal f.e. java.util.List implementations, but in my case, it’s absolutely unacceptable. I need to use my own structures, with no internal containers whatsoever – only memory chains (root.leftson.rightson etc.)

In other words, is it possible to marshall structure like:

class BinaryTree<T> implements Iterable<T> ?

Edit: Structure is supposed to look like (for BinaryTree<Person>):

<persons>
 <person>
   <name>John</name>
   <surname>Black</name>
 </person>
 <person>
   <name>Joe</name>
   <surname>Blue</name>
 </person>
</persons>

So when I add annotation to my structure like:

@XmlElement
private BinaryTree<Person> persons = new BinaryTree<Person>();
public BinaryTree<Person> getPersons() { return persons; }

,it just creates empty element like <persons />. I also tried @XmlElementWrapper annotations, but it won’t take custom structure (must be collection or something similar). It would be nice to have like @IterableElement or what 🙂

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T06:53:34+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 6:53 am

    There is a guide on how to do your own marshalling methods in the javadoc of XMLAdapter. This way, using the @XMLJavaAdapter annotation, you can define exactly how you want to marshal your class.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.