Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7512247
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T23:48:19+00:00 2026-05-29T23:48:19+00:00

I am using pimpl idiom in my program and I am stuck in one

  • 0

I am using pimpl idiom in my program and I am stuck in one place. My code is

Class*
Class::GetP()
{
return ClassImpl->GetP();
}

In my ClassImpl->GetP() I have

ClassImpl*
ClassImpl::GetP()
{
return pClassImpl;
}

As you can see I need to convert my pImpl bact to my caller type.
What is the way?

I dont want to use any casting
Please advice

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T23:48:20+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 11:48 pm

    Wouldn’t you simply do

    Class *
    Class::GetP()
    {
        return this;
    }
    

    since callers of Class::GetP() shouldn’t have a pointer to the internals anyway? (But then, what is that method for? It doesn’t give the caller anything that they don’t already have.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am using the pimpl idiom and want to reference one of the methods
When using the pImpl idiom is it preferable to use a boost:shared_ptr instead of
Using Rails 3.2.0.rc2 and ruby 1.9.3p0 In app/views/requests/_form.html.erb I have the following code for
I've been making some objects using the pimpl idiom, but I'm not sure whether
Using online interfaces to a version control system is a nice way to have
Using PyObjC , you can use Python to write Cocoa applications for OS X.
Using TortoiseSVN against VisualSVN I delete a source file that I should not have
Using VS2008, C#, .Net 2 and Winforms how can I make a regular Button
In languages like Java, you can declare a class without a modifier so it
In my program I am creating an object of a class in a loop

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.