Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6061413
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T08:56:06+00:00 2026-05-23T08:56:06+00:00

I am using Ruby on Rails 3.0.7 and I would like to iterate over

  • 0

I am using Ruby on Rails 3.0.7 and I would like to iterate over an array of objects (class istances) except for the element with id equal to 1 (the id refers to the array[1] index).

I know that I can use an if statement “internally” to an each statement and doing that I check for each “current”\”considered” element if id == 1. However, since the array is populated of a lot of data, I would like to find another way in order to accomplish the same things in a more performant way (avoiding to run the if each time).

How can I do?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T08:56:07+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 8:56 am
    a = ['a', 'b', 'c']
    a.each_with_index.reject {|el,i| i == 1}.each do |el,i|
      # do whatever with the element
      puts el
    end
    

    Is IMHO a better way of doing the selection instead of using your own explicit if statement. I believe, however, that it will result in approximately the same performance as using if, maybe even slightly lower.

    If after benchmarking as others have suggested you know that the time this takes is definitely slower than what you can allow it, and it is the selection causing the slowness then this can be easily modified to remove the selection in a number of ways:

    a = ['a', 'b', 'c']
    n = 1
    (a.first(n) + a.drop(n + 1)).each do |el|
      # do whatever with the element
      puts el
    end
    

    Unfortunately I believe this will also be slower than running the simple if. One that I believe might have the potential for speed is:

    a = ['a', 'b', 'c']
    n = 1
    ((0...n).to_a+((n+1)...a.size).to_a).map{|i| a[i]}.each do |el|
      # do whatever with the element
      puts el
    end
    

    But this again has a high possibility of being slower.

    EDIT

    Benchmark is in this gist. These results actually surprised me, reject is by far the slowest option, followed by the ranges. The highest performing after not removing the element at all was using first and drop to select all the elements around it.

    The results as a percentage using no selection as a baseline:

    with if             146%
    with first and drop 104%
    without if          100%
    

    Obviously this is highly dependant on what you do with the elements, this was testing with probably the fastest operation Ruby can perform. The slower the operation the less difference these will have. As always: Benchmark, Benchmark, Benchmark

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.