Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4019398
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T10:05:58+00:00 2026-05-20T10:05:58+00:00

I am using Ruby on Rails 3 and I would like to use a

  • 0

I am using Ruby on Rails 3 and I would like to use a case statement that even after matching a when statement can continue to checks other when statement until the last else.

For example

case var
when '1'
  if var2 == ...
    ...
  else
    ...
    puts "Don't make nothig but continue to check!"
    # Here I would like to continue to check if a 'when' statement will match 'var' until the 'else' case
  end
when '2'
  ...
...
else
  put "Yeee!"

end

Is it possible in Ruby? If so, how?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T10:05:59+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 10:05 am

    Ruby doesn’t have any sort of fall-through for case.

    One alternative be a series of if statements using the === method, which is what case uses internally to compare the items.

    has_matched? = false
    
    if '2' === var
      has_matched? = true
      # stuff
    end
    
    if '3' === var
      has_matched? = true
      # other stuff
    end
    
    if something_else === var
      has_matched? = true
      # presumably some even more exciting stuff
    end
    
    if !has_matched?
      # more stuff
    end
    

    This has two glaring issues.

    1. It isn’t very DRY: has_matched? = true is littered all over the place.

    2. You always need to remember to place var on the right-hand-side of ===, because that’s what case does behind the scenes.

    You could create your own class with a matches? method that encapsulates this functionality. It could have a constructor that takes the value you’ll be matching against (in this case, var), and it could have an else_do method that only executes its block if its internal @has_matched? instance variable is still false.

    Edit:

    The === method can mean anything you want it to mean. Generally, it’s a more “forgiving” way to test equivalency between two objects. Here’s an example from this this page:

    class String
      def ===(other_str)
        self.strip[0, other_str.length].downcase == other_str.downcase
      end
    end
    
    class Array
      def ===(str)
        self.any? {|elem| elem.include?(str)}
      end
    end
    
    class Fixnum
      def ===(str)
        self == str.to_i
      end
    end
    

    Essentially, when Ruby encounters case var, it will call === on the objects against which you are comparing var.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am using Ruby on Rails 3 and I would like to use RJS
I would like to build a simple REST web service (using Ruby on Rails).
I would like to create something like this using ruby on rails. Im not
I am using Ruby on Rails 3 and I would like to implement something
I am using Ruby on Rails 3 and I would like to initialize my
I am using Ruby on Rails 3 and I would know in which case
I am using Ruby on Rails 3 and I would like to move some
I am using Ruby on Rails 3 and I would like to know some
I am running Ruby on Rails 3 and I would like to use Prototip
I am using Ruby on Rails 3 and I would like to handle user

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.