Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6471207
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T06:11:51+00:00 2026-05-25T06:11:51+00:00

I am using SQL Server Execution plan for analysing the performance of a stored

  • 0

I am using SQL Server Execution plan for analysing the performance of a stored procedure. I have two results with and without the index. In both these results the estimated cost shows the same value (.0032831) but the cost % differs from one another as first, without index is 7% and with Index is 14%.

What does it really means?

Please help me with this.,

Thanks in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T06:11:51+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 6:11 am

    It means that the plan without the index is costed as being doubly expensive.

    For the first one the total plan cost is .0032831/0.07 = 0.0469, for the second one the total plan cost is .0032831/0.14 which is clearly going to be half that number.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Guys, I am using SQL Server 2000 and executing the sp_columns stored procedure to
[using SQL Server 2005] I have a table full of users, I want to
I'm using SQL Server 2008. I have a table with over 3 million records,
I am using SQL Server 2005 and I have noticed something strange when I
Using SQL Server 2005. This is something I've noticed while doing some performance analysis.
I am attempting to troubleshoot a slow running stored procedure in SQL Server 2005.
Scenario : I am using a T-SQL stored proc (Sql Server Management Studio) to
We have a SQL Server DB with 150-200 stored procs, all of which produce
I created a non-clustered index (using the execution plan tools in MSSQLSMS) that greatly
Using SQL Server, how do I split a string so I can access item

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.