Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6536173
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T10:27:34+00:00 2026-05-25T10:27:34+00:00

I am using the Entity Framework to function import two stored procedures from my

  • 0

I am using the Entity Framework to function import two stored procedures from my database.

The functions are as follows:

_db.GetDeviceTypeModelAttributes(deviceTypeID, deviceModelID);
_db.GetDeviceConfigurableAttributes(deviceID, true);

Both functions return a System.Data.Objects.ObjectResult<int?>.

What’s the best way to get them into one result set? Using the .Union extension?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T10:27:35+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 10:27 am

    Assuming they have the same number and type of columns, with the same names, then the easiest would be the Concat extension, unless you need to make sure the contents are unique in which case use Union.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Ok I've seen this question Entity Framework: Generate Database From Model removes Stored Procedures
If I create a function import for a stored procedure in Entity Framework 4
I am using Entity Framework from .NET 3.5 I have two tables with 0-1
I am using the function import feature of the entity framework to call a
I am getting timeouts using the Entity Framework (EF) when using a function import
I'm using the Entity Framework (EF) to create a complex type from a stored
I'm in VS2008 with Entity Framework. I'm accessing objects from the database using esql
I'm using Entity Framework. I create a function in SQL Server where I'll import
I'm using Entity Framework O/R mapper from Microsoft and using entity classes (generated classes
I have a problem with the following Linq query using Entity Framework: from o

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.