Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 638027
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T20:41:16+00:00 2026-05-13T20:41:16+00:00

I am using the famous module pattern for creating namespaces however its cumbersome to

  • 0

I am using the famous module pattern for creating namespaces however its cumbersome to write ns1.ns2.member to access a member from ns3(ns1.ns2.ns3).
I do not like using a shortcut var(_ns2=ns1.ns2) for this purpose also with statement considered harmfull so what is the better to handle this problem?
is it possible to combine scope of namespaces or whatever? thanks.

var NS1 = (function ()
{
    function $(id)
    {
        return document.getElementById(id);
    }    

    return {
        $: $
    }
})();


NS1.NS2 = function()
{
    function someFunc()
    {
        // Do not want the below one.
        NS1.$('...');
        // Is there a way to access $ directly.
        // without defining a variable for it here or using with statement.
    }
}();
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T20:41:17+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:41 pm

    I don’t really know what you’re talking about, and even if I make believe I do I don’t see what’s so bad about “ns1.ns2.ns3”, but here are a couple of ideas:

    (function(tempNamespace) {
      blahBlah(tempNamespace.something, tempNamespace.somethingElse);
      // ...
    })(ns1.ns2.ns3);
    

    Or combine a few:

    var nsCombined = $.extend({}, ns1, ns2, ns3); // jQuery
    

    Some description of what it is you’re doing with these namespaces and how much code we’re talking about would be useful. I find that once you start using something like jQuery, for most pages — even with fairly complicated client-side behavior — the need for large long-term data structures goes way down.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 303k
  • Answers 303k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It is an RPC error, you'll see it when you… May 13, 2026 at 8:41 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Attach your Vc to the program. Enable catch of all… May 13, 2026 at 8:41 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes, it is possible, and it does work. Check out… May 13, 2026 at 8:41 pm

Related Questions

I am currently working with using Bezier curves and surfaces to draw the famous
I know that we should only create repositories for Aggregate Roots and not for
I am trying to do a sample app in python which uses some COM
I'm new to the world of IoC and having a problem with implementing it
Since there is no explicit typing in python, I want to be able to

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.