Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8136173
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T10:40:36+00:00 2026-06-06T10:40:36+00:00

I am using the Grails ajaxflow plugin for creating a basic wizard. One issue

  • 0

I am using the Grails ajaxflow plugin for creating a basic wizard. One issue I have is the controller action naming that is used by default. Specifically, let’s say I have a controller named ThingController, in which the default flow is named pagesFlow. This results in a wizard url during execution as such ..

/thing/pages?execution...

Generally the wizard is intended to allow adding of ‘things’. As it were, I would prefer a url that indicated such ..

/thing/add?execution...

Is there a way, either by changing the pagesFlow definition, or through custom url mapping to achieve this result?

I have briefly attempted both with no luck. The ajaxflow plugin appears to require this default naming, and tbh I don’t understand url mappings well enough yet.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T10:40:37+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 10:40 am

    I haven’t used ajaxFlow specifically but I’ve worked with grails webflow before. Generally what you’re asking for isn’t possible because webflow basically manages the different “actions” like add/delete/update etc for your flow behind the scene so only the flow name “pages” is exposed.

    However if you really want to have a distinct name, the only workaround I can think of is to use the subflow feature of webflow. The webflow documentation is part of the grails doc http://grails.org/doc/latest/guide/theWebLayer.html#subflowsAndConversations.

    The idea is that a subflow is just another flow that you define. Flows can call another flow and have the second flow return the results back to the first flow. So in your case you would have your main flow call addFlow, updateFlow etc. Conceptually even though all of your actions belong to a single flow, there’s nothing stopping you from breaking each out into its own flow. That way you can have the name of your URL reflect your actions. You could even define your subflow in a different controller as well so you can affect the controller name in the url.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm using Grails and I have a local-plugin (that I wrote) that I'm using
I am using Grails multi-tenant plugin with single-tenant mode. I have used spring security
Using Grails and CXF, I have published a small web service that looks like
I have a Grails 2.0.0 project that was created using grails create-app . In
I am using grails and i have a basic form remote <g:formRemote name=add onSuccess=close();
I have been heavily using grails with netbeans for one of my projects, I
I am currently using Grails Mail 1.0 plugin in my project. I used it
I have issues running grails using grails > run-app If I change a controller
I'm using Grails 1.3.7. I have some code that uses the built-in base64Encode function
I'm using Grails 1.2.1. I have this method in my controller … class SocialMediaCacheProxyController

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.