Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 612601
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T17:54:40+00:00 2026-05-13T17:54:40+00:00

I am using the latest beta of Visual Studio 2010 and the Entity Framework.

  • 0

I am using the latest beta of Visual Studio 2010 and the Entity Framework. It’s mostly really neat, but here’s my situation:

  • I have a table T with columns Id and Name.
  • I have an auto-generated entity with Id and Name properties.
  • Finally, I have a stored procedure that selects only Id from T.

Trying to map my entity to the stored procedure results in an EntityCommandExecutionException:

A member of [the entity], ‘Name’, does not have a corresponding column in the data reader with the same name.

That makes sense, but is there some way to partially populate my entity from the stored procedure call and then fully materialize it later with a second query?

Nine months ago, the answer to this question appeared to involve a great deal of manual labor. In my case, we have hundreds of stored procedures, and literally none of them return full rows. The Entity Framework has come a long way since then, so I am hoping something might’ve changed.

Thank you in advance for any help!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T17:54:41+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 5:54 pm

    One approach might be to map the procedure results into a complex type, and then customize the code generation to add a method to this type which will materialize the entire object.

    One possible hitch with this idea is that I’m not sure it’s possible to customize code generation for complex types. You can certainly customize code generation for entity types, as explained in great detail in this post. It seems like you should be able to customize complex types, as well, but I’ve never tried it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 360k
  • Answers 360k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Well, if you really have the time and don't need… May 14, 2026 at 2:38 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I do believe ParseLex is in the base set of… May 14, 2026 at 2:38 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Inline blocks could perhaps be useful here. May 14, 2026 at 2:38 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.