Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6064051
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T09:14:17+00:00 2026-05-23T09:14:17+00:00

I am using the Microchip C18 compiler and on occurrence of an interrupt I

  • 0

I am using the Microchip C18 compiler and on occurrence of an interrupt I am experiencing a quite long delay before the ISR code starts running.

As an experiment, this is in my main function:

while(1)
{
    LATAbits.LATA4 = 1;
    LATAbits.LATA4 = 0;
}

As interrupt handler I am using this code I copied from some example (I don’t know why it’s done this way):

#pragma interrupt high_isr
void high_isr(void)
{
    LATAbits.LATA4 = 1;
    LATAbits.LATA4 = 1;
    LATAbits.LATA4 = 0;
    LATAbits.LATA4 = 1;
    LATAbits.LATA4 = 1;
    LATAbits.LATA4 = 0;
}

#pragma code high_vector=0x08
void interrupt_at_high_vector(void)
{
_asm GOTO high_isr _endasm
}

I am receiving bytes via SPI and shortly after a byte is received, the main loop stops. Then a delay of 16.5 µs follows before the ISR code starts running. That is 165 instruction cycles!

interrupt timing
enlarge image

I know there is some context saving associated with interrupts and that it’s even worse with low priority interrupts. I have disabled IPEN and I am using only the high priority vector. Is 165 instructions a normal duration for context saving?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T09:14:17+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 9:14 am

    Under some circumstances interrupt overhead can be great as yours!
    Take a look at this.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to port code over to compile using Microchip's C18 compiler for a
Using Microchip C18 compiler with a pic18f, I want to create a big buffer
I'm writing for a microcontroller (dsPIC24) using Microchip's compiler. The peripheral devices are all
update I'm using pic 18F4550 with microchip v8.63 and C compiler. I'm trying to
I am currently starting out with programming micro controllers using C30 (A C compiler
I'm writing C for the PIC32MX, compiled with Microchip's PIC32 C compiler (based on
I'm using a crude IDE (Microchip MPLAB) with C30 toolchain on Windows XP. The
I'm currently using Microchip's Fixed Point Library, but I think this applies to most
I have a question regarding stepper motor control while using the Microchip TCP/IP stack.
Using Rails 3.2.0.rc2 and ruby 1.9.3p0 In app/views/requests/_form.html.erb I have the following code for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.