Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 744989
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T09:02:31+00:00 2026-05-14T09:02:31+00:00

I am very tempted to use long wait http or periodic polling by the

  • 0

I am very tempted to use long wait http or periodic polling by the client to set up pseudo-sockets on the browser side, for an application that would be used publicly.

But then on the 2nd thought, I am thinking HTML 5 is here.

But on the 3rd thought, what is the percentage of browsers out there that remain non-HTML5 within 12 months, 24 months, 36 months? If there are at least 20% of browsers still incapable of HTML5, then I cannot depend on HTML5 because 20% of users not being able to access an application is a significant amount.

What do you think, how would your advice be (to me and to developers in general)?

Q1.
Is there any point in rigging in COMET into an application anymore? I am thinking of gwt comet – http://code.google.com/p/gwt-comet/.

Q2.
Should we release a new public application within the next 2 months that is dependent on HTML5 sockets and tell non-HTML5 browser users “sorry, your browser version cannot access this application”?

Or should we architect the apps to use communication like GWT RPC?

Q3.
I am also very distrustful of long wait http request. I have never used it before but I have a horrible feeling about it. I have been using 10 to 20 second client-side polling. Is long wait http request risky (risk of hanging a browser session)? Does long wait request present any additional security risk?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T09:02:32+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 9:02 am

    If you’re interested in being a good citizen, yes, you should absolutely tell people that you don’t support their browser in 2 months. The only reason IE6 keeps hanging around is because developers keep bending over backwards to support it, while all they’re doing is allowing users to continue to function with a horribly broken and insecure browser. IE8 is reasonably good, and IE9 is great (time to release unclear though), and all the modern Webkit/Opera/Gecko-based browsers are “good enough”, and tend to have user bases that upgrade more frequently than IE.

    Of course, market penetration is always a big problem, and a consideration when you’re trying to make money from a product. I recognize that telling people that their browser sucks isn’t always an option, but more people need to consider it – we need to get rid of these legacy browsers, and that won’t happen until we stop supporting them.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a very simple command line Java application that I wish to port
I have a very simple application in c# it has a Microsoft SQL Server
Very simply put: I have a class that consists mostly of static public members,
Very simply put, I have the following code snippet: FILE* test = fopen(C:\\core.u, w);
Very often when working on an ASP.NET web site, the options View Code and
Very simple question, is there any cloud server enviroments avaliable these days for us
Very basic question: how do I write a short literal in C++? I know
Very simply, what is tail-call optimization? More specifically, what are some small code snippets
Very odd problem as this is working perfectly on our old Classic ASP site.
Very direct question, i need to know if its possible and maybe where to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.