Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6027741
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T04:38:13+00:00 2026-05-23T04:38:13+00:00

I am wokring on pthread pool and there will be five separate thread and

  • 0

I am wokring on pthread pool and there will be five separate thread and one queue. All the five threads are competing to get a job from the queue and I know the basic idea that I need to do lock/unlock and wait/signal.

But I am not sure how many mutex and cond variable I should have. Right now I have only one mutex and cond variable and all five thread will use it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T04:38:13+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 4:38 am

    To elaborate on @Ivan’s solution…

    Instead of a mutex + condition variable, you can use a counting semaphore + atomic operations to create a very efficient queue.

    semaphore dequeue_sem = 0;
    semaphore enqueue_sem = 37; // or however large you want to bound your queue
    

    Enqueue operation is just:

    wait_for(enqueue_sem)
    atomic_add_to_queue(element)
    signal(dequeue_sem)
    

    Dequeue operation is:

    wait_for(dequeue_sem)
    element = atomic_remove_from_queue()
    signal(enqueue_sem)
    

    The “atomic_add_to_queue” and “atomic_remove_from_queue” are typicaly implemented using atomic compare&exchange in a tight loop.

    In addition to its symmetry, this formulation bounds the maximum size of the queue; if a thread calls enqueue() on a full queue, it will block. This is almost certainly what you want for any queue in a multi-threaded environment. (Your computer has finite memory; consuming it without bound should be avoided when possible.)

    If you do stick with a mutex and condition variables, you want two conditions, one for enqueue to wait on (and deque to signal) and one for the other way around. The conditions mean “queue not full” and “queue not empty”, respectively, and the enqueue/dequeue code is similarly symmetric.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

There are multiple threads working on a task. Once a thread succeeds all of
I've been working with pthreads a fair bit recently and there's one little thing
I'm working on a project in C that requires threads running on separate CPUs
Are there locks in Linux where the waiting queue is FIFO? This seems like
I know there are some threading libraries for C++, like Pthread, Boost etc out
I am working on a network programming and I have created a thread pool.
I'm working on a thread library which implement user level threads (i have something
I have a simple thread pool written in pthreads implemented using a pool of
i'm working with a multi-threaded program (using pthreads) that currently create a background thread
I've managed to get my pthreads program sort of working. Basically I am trying

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.