Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 968717
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T02:31:41+00:00 2026-05-16T02:31:41+00:00

I am wondering if it is a good idea to rely on frameworks like

  • 0

I am wondering if it is a good idea to rely on frameworks like jQuery or MooTools or should we just use plain JavaScript?

Apart from avoiding the re-invention of wheel, do they add any specific value?

Since the frameworks are open to the public, can there be possibility of exploitation of any security holes that might appear (of course, unintentionally 🙂 ) in the frameworks?

Are there any other points that are to be considered when choosing a framework or otherwise?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T02:31:42+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:31 am
    1. Frameworks solve cross-browser bugs which normally would cost hours of your time, so you can focus on functionality instead of worrying about some edge case browser bug.. instead of wasting 4-5 hours solving a bug spend that time with your family.

    2. Frameworks such as jQuery are pretty loaded with stuff like animation, selectors, html manipulation so there’s usually some sort of functionality already built into the library, again saving you more time and the API makes it really easy to actually accomplish complex things.

    3. Interpreters and browsers are only getting faster and faster so I don’t particularly think it’s a huge issue loading an entire library up. In addition thanks to Google et al we get very fast cdns and nowadays lots of sites are using the same exact URI to pull the script in, meaning there’s a higher rate of the script getting cached and reused on another site.

    4. Instead of every single web developer having their own library it’s much more efficient having thousands of people concentrated to bettering a handful of libraries so cross-browser bugs get documented and fixed.

    5. Competition is a good thing, the result of the slickspeed tests resulted in much faster selector engines such as Sizzle. Developers not having to worry about trivial DOM bugs means more complex libraries are created daily, which means entry-level developers have access to very powerful plugins.

    As far as security, jQuery for example will detect if the browser is capable of parsing JSON natively and if so, rely on that. Usually any modern browser will have this, and it’s much safer than eval… so jQuery strives to use the safer and more secure methods first. It will only use eval if there isnt a JSON.parse method available.

    An important thing to remember in jQuery though is remembering you’re still coding in Javascript. Usually people get too caught up in the sugar coated methods and wrapping everything in $, I think it’s important to know you can still do this.href instead of $(this).attr('href') if you would like an absolutely normalized uri for example.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm just wondering if it is a good idea to make a data structure
I was wondering if it were a good idea to use an initializer list
I was wondering if it's a good idea to use CSS display property to
Just wondering, if it is generally a good idea to compress jar files that
I was just wondering if it was a good idea to override equals and
I was wondering if it would be a good idea to use callLater in
I'm wondering if this is a good idea or not, either way I'd like
I was just wondering if it's a good idea to do this. For example
I'm wondering if it's a good idea to use DFS to sync content across
I'm wondering if it's a good idea to make verifications in getters and setters

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.