Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 221497
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T19:02:20+00:00 2026-05-11T19:02:20+00:00

I am wondering if there is any performance differences between String s = someObject.toString();

  • 0

I am wondering if there is any performance differences between

  1. String s = someObject.toString(); System.out.println(s);

    and

  2. System.out.println(someObject.toString());

Looking at the generated bytecode, it seems to have differences. Is the JVM able to optimize this bytecode at runtime to have both solutions providing same performances ?

In this simple case, of course solution 2 seems more appropriate but sometimes I would prefer solution 1 for readability purposes and I just want to be sure to not introduce performances "decreases" in critical code sections.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T19:02:20+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:02 pm

    The creation of a temporary variable (especially something as small as a String) is inconsequential to the speed of your code, so you should stop worrying about this.

    Try measuring the actual time spent in this part of your code and I bet you’ll find there’s no performance difference at all. The time it takes to call toString() and print out the result takes far longer than the time it takes to store a temporary value, and I don’t think you’ll find a measurable difference here at all.

    Even if the bytecode looks different here, it’s because javac is naive and your JIT Compiler does the heavy lifting for you. If this code really matters for speed, then it will be executed many, many times, and your JIT will select it for compilation to native code. It is highly likely that both of these compile to the same native code.

    Finally, why are you calling System.out.println() in performance-critical code? If anything here is going to kill your performance, that will.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 207k
  • Answers 207k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Ok, this should be a SQL 2000 compatible version. Based… May 12, 2026 at 9:20 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The Decorator design pattern is an excellent starting point for… May 12, 2026 at 9:20 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use a failure-driven loop: test(X, 1, 4, 5), writeln(X), fail… May 12, 2026 at 9:20 pm

Related Questions

I am wondering if there are any differences to derived classes when using abstract
If you've bought into the functional programming paradigm, the chances are that you like
Dupe: return statement in a lock procedure: inside or outside The title is a
I am working on an application and one design approach involves extremely heavy use

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.