Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 946257
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T22:53:12+00:00 2026-05-15T22:53:12+00:00

I am wondering if this is possible. My code looks like this: indexStop =

  • 0

I am wondering if this is possible. My code looks like this:

indexStop = find(firstinSeq(x,4) ~= ...
                 littledataPassed(y:length(littledataPassed),4), 1, 'first');
for z= 0:(n-1)
   indexProcess = find((littledataPassed(y:y+indexStop-1,6) == 1 & ... 
      littledataPassed(y:y+indexStop-1,2) == firstinSeq(x,2) & ... 
      littledataPassed(y:y+indexStop-1,5) == z), 1, 'first'); 
   if isempty(indexProcess)
      msgLength[n](countmsgLength[n],:)= [firstinSeq(x,:) [0 0 0 0 0 0]];
   else
      msgLength[n](countmsgLength[n],:)= [firstinSeq(x,:) ...
         littledataPassed(y+indexProcess-1,:)];
   end
   countmsgLength[n]= countmsgLength[n] + 1;
end

I am hoping to have everywhere that reads [n] be switched to the actual value of n, such that I could use this to add data to nine different variables in the format msgLength#. I have tried searching tutorials and what not but haven’t seen anything on the topic.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T22:53:12+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 10:53 pm

    It’s almost always better to use arrays or cell arrays to store data than to create a bunch of variables named a1, a2, a3, etc. For example, you can initialize msgLength as a cell array with n elements:

    msgLength = cell(1,n);
    

    And you can access cells of msgLength using curly braces:

    msgLength{n} = ...  %# Assign something to cell n
    

    Your variable countmsgLength can just be a regular numeric array, since it appears to only store n values. You would just have to change the square brackets to parentheses (i.e. [n] to (n)).

    However, if you really want to create n separate variables, you will likely end up using the EVAL function. This question and this question show some examples of how to create variables names using the value of another variable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm wondering whether something like this is possible (and relatively easy to do), and
I was wondering if it is possible to do something like this: <uc1:TestControl ID=TestControl1
I use a pattern that looks something like this often. I'm wondering if this
I'm wondering if this is possible in SQL. Say you have two tables A
I'm trying to handle this possible exploit and wondering what is the best way
I've been wondering this for a while but since it hasn't come up much
I've been wondering this for some time. As the title say, which is faster,
I'm wondering if this is a good design. I have a number of tables
I was always wondering about this seemingly utopic world of open source. Assuming the
I was reading through this article: http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2008/12/running-everything-on-aws-soocialcom.html And I was wondering if this was

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.