Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7662223
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T13:44:45+00:00 2026-05-31T13:44:45+00:00

I am wondering why GroupBy works with anonymous types. List<string> values = new List<string>();

  • 0

I am wondering why GroupBy works with anonymous types.

List<string> values = new List<string>();
values.GroupBy(s => new { Length = s.Length, Value = s })

Anonymous types do not implement any interfaces, so I am confused how this is working.

I assume that the algorithm is working by creating an instance of the anonymous type for each item in the source and using hashing to group the items together. However, no IEqualityComparer is provided to define how to generate a hash or whether two instances are equal. I would assume, then, that the Object.Equals and Object.GetHashCode methods would be the fallback, which rely on object identity.

So, how is it that this is working as expected? And yet it doesn’t work in an OrderBy. Do anonymous types override Equals and GetHashCode? or does the underlying GroupBy algorithm do some magic I haven’t thought of?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T13:44:47+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 1:44 pm

    As per the documentation, an anonymous type is a reference type:

    From the perspective of the common language runtime, an anonymous type is no different from any other reference type.

    Therefore, it will be using the default implementation for those functions as implemented by System.Object (which at least for equality is based on referential equality).

    EDIT: Actually, as per that same first doco link it says:

    Because the Equals and GetHashCode methods on anonymous types are defined in terms of the Equals and GetHashcode methods of the properties, two instances of the same anonymous type are equal only if all their properties are equal.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Wondering if there's any not-too-hard way to edit non-form text in html 4. I
Wondering if there is any Text to Speech software available as a plug in
Wondering if anybody out there has any success in using the JDEdwards XMLInterop functionality.
Wondering how to open many new windows with Javascript. I have found plenty of
Wondering if there is any way to get the lambda expressions that result from
I have following sql syntax. This works fine but I was wondering if there
I was wondering if it would be possible to enumerate returned rows. Not according
I am trying to apply a bit of groupby/crosstabbing logic to an IEnumerable list
I'm new to SQLAlchemy, and was wondering what the best way to go about
I've solved this issue but I'm just wondering why this works the way it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.